Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 726

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proposal for strained type II superlattice infrared detectors

Smith, D. L., Mailhiot, C.·1987·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

We show that strained type II superlattices made of InAs-Ga1−xInxSb x∼0.4 have favorable optical properties for infrared detection. By adjusting the layer thicknesses and the alloy composition, a wide range of wavelengths can be reached. Optical absorption calculations for a case where λc∼10 μm show that near threshold the absorption is as good as for the HgCdTe alloy with the same band gap. The electron effective mass is nearly isotropic and equal to 0.04 m. This effective mass should give favorable electrical properties, such as small diode tunneling currents and good mobilities and diffusion lengths.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.339468

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 726

Metadata

Authors
Smith, D. L., & Mailhiot, C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
1987-09-15
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
2545-2548
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W1996590924
Cited by
726
References
0
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proposal for strained type II superlattice infrared detectors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.339468
The paper
Smith, D. L., & Mailhiot, C. (1987). Proposal for strained type II superlattice infrared detectors. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.339468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.