Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermodynamics and kinetics of intracellular ice formation during freezing of biological cells

Toner, Mehmet, Cravalho, Ernest G., Karel, Marcus·1990·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

A physicochemical model based on the modified classical heterogeneous nucleation theory was proposed to analyze the ice formation inside biological cells during freezing. According to this model, intracellular ice formation (IIF) may be catalyzed either by the plasma membrane via the effects of the external ice on the plasma membrane, called surface-catalyzed nucleation (SCN), or by the intracellular particles, called volume-catalyzed nucleation (VCN), depending on the freezing conditions. The model for IIF was coupled with the model describing the kinetics of water transport to predict the thermodynamic state of the cytoplasm. A method to estimate the nucleation frequency from the observed probability of nucleation was suggested. This method was based on the assumption that each cell has the same heteronucleating particles with identical properties to alter the nucleation kinetics in an identical way. This allowed the correlation of the experimental probability of IIF with the nucleation rate. It was suggested that the uncertainties in the experimental conditions could be minimized if cells were cooled at rapid rates to prevent water transport during freezing. The model was applied to mouse oocytes at metaphase II. Correlation of the theory with the experimental kinetics of the cumulative fraction of IIF revealed preexponentional factors of 3.56×108 (m2 s)−1 and 1.84×1050 (m3 s)−1, and exponential factors of 4.6×109 and 1.08×1012 K5 for SCN and VCN, respectively. The contact angle between the internal surface of the plasma membrane and the ice cluster for SCN, θ, was determined to be 35° for freezing in isotonic solutions (285 mosm) increasing linearly to 47° in hypertonic solutions (1035 mosm). SCN was active between ∼−5 and −20 °C in the presence of external ice. It is suggested that the presence of external ice alters the plasma membrane through its chemical, electrical, mechanical, ionic, and thermal effects, to make it an energetically favorable site for heterogeneous nucleation. For VCN, lower and upper limits for θ and R were found to be 60°<θ<100° and 10−7<R<4×10−7 cm, respectively. VCN was active between ∼−30 and −35 °C.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.345670

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Toner, M., Cravalho, E. G., & Karel, M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
1990-02-01
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
1582-1593
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W1984428412
Cited by
378
References
2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermodynamics and kinetics of intracellular ice formation during freezing of biological cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.345670
The paper
Toner, M., Cravalho, E. G., & Karel, M. (1990). Thermodynamics and kinetics of intracellular ice formation during freezing of biological cells. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.345670

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.