Cited by 56Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsVacuum and Plasma ArcsAtmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-dimensional particle-in-cell Monte Carlo simulation of a miniature inductively coupled plasma source

Open access
Takao, Yoshinori, Kusaba, Naoki, Eriguchi, Koji, Ono, Kouichi·2010·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

Two-dimensional axisymmetric particle-in-cell simulations with Monte Carlo collision calculations (PIC-MCC) have been conducted to investigate argon microplasma characteristics of a miniature inductively coupled plasma source with a 5-mm-diameter planar coil, where the radius and length are 5 mm and 6 mm, respectively. Coupling the rf-electromagnetic fields to the plasma is carried out based on a collisional model and a kinetic model. The former employs the cold-electron approximation and the latter incorporates warm-electron effects. The numerical analysis has been performed for pressures in the range 370–770 mTorr and at 450 MHz rf powers below 3.5 W, and then the PIC-MCC results are compared with available experimental data and fluid simulation results. The results show that a considerably thick sheath structure can be seen compared with the plasma reactor size and the electron energy distribution is non-Maxwellian over the entire plasma region. As a result, the distribution of the electron temperature is quite different from that obtained in the fluid model. The electron temperature as a function of rf power is in a reasonable agreement with experimental data. The pressure dependence of the plasma density shows different tendency between the collisional and kinetic model, implying noncollisional effects even at high pressures due to the high rf frequency, where the electron collision frequency is less than the rf driving frequency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3506536

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ref. 19 compared experimental, fluid, and kinetic results for a discharge in argon at pressure 370-770 mTorr, driven at 450 MHz and RF powers below 3.5 W, and found discrepancies between the 2D fluid and the PIC results, which can be linked to the non-Maxwellian EEDF observed in the PIC simulations.

    “Ref. 19 compared experimental, fluid, and kinetic results for a discharge in argon at pressure 370-770 mTorr, driven at 450 MHz and RF powers below 3.5 W, and found discrepancies between the 2D fluid and the PIC results, which can be linked to the non-Maxwellian EEDF observed in the PIC simulations.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 2000, Micropropulsion for Small Spacecraft
  2. 2006, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 15, 211, 10.1088/0963-0252/15/2/006 · DOI
  3. 2006, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 45, 8235, 10.1143/JJAP.45.8235 · DOI
  4. 2007, J. Appl. Phys., 101, 123307, 10.1063/1.2749336 · DOI
  5. 2008, Pure Appl. Chem., 80, 2013, 10.1351/pac200880092013 · DOI
  6. 2009, Phys. Plasmas, 16, 083505, 10.1063/1.3205889 · DOI
  7. 2009, J. Appl. Phys., 106, 063305, 10.1063/1.3224863 · DOI
  8. 2006, J. Phys. D, 39, R55, 10.1088/0022-3727/39/3/R01 · DOI
  9. 2006, IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng., 1, 145, 10.1002/tee.20031 · DOI
  10. 2006, Int. J. Mass. Spectrom., 248, 87, 10.1016/j.ijms.2005.11.010 · DOI
  11. 2008, Plasma Processes Polym., 5, 322, 10.1002/ppap.200700162 · DOI
  12. 2007, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 35, 1274, 10.1109/TPS.2007.904827 · DOI
  13. 2000, J. Appl. Phys., 88, 6216, 10.1063/1.1319975 · DOI
  14. 2004, J. Appl. Phys., 95, 2272, 10.1063/1.1644043 · DOI
  15. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 075004, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.075004 · DOI
  16. 2000, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 18, 2446, 10.1116/1.1288945 · DOI
  17. 2006, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 34, 973, 10.1109/TPS.2006.875730 · DOI
  18. 1991, Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation, 10.1887/0750301171 · DOI
  19. 1991, J. Appl. Phys., 69, 656, 10.1063/1.347345 · DOI
  20. 1991, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., 11, 103, 10.1007/BF01447036 · DOI
  21. 2009, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 18, 045027, 10.1088/0963-0252/18/4/045027 · DOI
  22. 1968, Modern Electromagnetic Fields
  23. 2008, J. Appl. Phys., 103, 013309, 10.1063/1.2828155 · DOI
  24. 2009, Plasma Processes Polym., 6, 360, 10.1002/ppap.200800212 · DOI
  25. 2006, J. Phys. D, 39, 4031, 10.1088/0022-3727/39/18/015 · DOI
  26. 2001, J. Comput. Phys., 174, 421, 10.1006/jcph.2001.6923 · DOI
  27. 2008, J. Phys. D, 41, 245208, 10.1088/0022-3727/41/24/245208 · DOI
  28. 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 1112, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.1112 · DOI
  29. 1999, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 38, 4404, 10.1143/JJAP.38.4404 · DOI
  30. 1959, J. Chem. Phys., 30, 641, 10.1063/1.1730023 · DOI
  31. 1994, Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing
  32. 2004, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 13, 315, 10.1088/0963-0252/13/2/018 · DOI
  33. 1997, J. Appl. Phys., 81, 5966, 10.1063/1.364385 · DOI
  34. 2003, J. Appl. Phys., 94, 2821, 10.1063/1.1597976 · DOI
  35. 2004, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 73, 756, 10.1143/JPSJ.73.756 · DOI
  36. 2007, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 16, 90, 10.1088/0963-0252/16/1/012 · DOI
  37. 1997, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 15, 564, 10.1116/1.580684 · DOI
  38. 2006, Thin Solid Films, 506–507, 729, 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.150 · DOI
  39. 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1844, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1844 · DOI
  40. 2009, J. Phys. D, 42, 194008, 10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194008 · DOI
  41. 1995, J. Appl. Phys., 78, 1446, 10.1063/1.360723 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takao, Y., Kusaba, N., Eriguchi, K., & Ono, K.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
093309-1-093309-8
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2156583701
Cited by
56
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion)
  • Yokohama National University Repository (Yokohama National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21110008)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications
Keywords
inductively coupled plasma, planar coils, sheath structure, electron energy distribution, non-Maxwellian distribution, electron temperature, plasma density, collision model, kinetic model, pressure dependence, RF power dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review