The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A smooth, nonsingular, and faithful discretization scheme for polarizable continuum models: The switching/Gaussian approach
Abstract
Polarizable continuum models (PCMs) are a widely used family of implicit solvent models based on reaction-field theory and boundary-element discretization of the solute/continuum interface. An often overlooked aspect of these theories is that discretization of the interface typically does not afford a continuous potential energy surface for the solute. In addition, we show that discretization can lead to numerical singularities and violations of exact variational conditions. To fix these problems, we introduce the switching/Gaussian (SWIG) method, a discretization scheme that overcomes several longstanding problems with PCMs. Our approach generalizes a procedure introduced by York and Karplus [J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 11060 (1999)], extending it beyond the conductor-like screening model. Comparison to other purportedly smooth PCM implementations reveals certain artifacts in these alternative approaches, which are avoided using the SWIG methodology. The versatility of our approach is demonstrated via geometry optimizations, vibrational frequency calculations, and molecular dynamics simulations, for solutes described using quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revised self-consistent continuum solvation in electronic-structure calculations
Andreussi, O., Dabo, I., & Marzari, N. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3676407 · Cited by 538
Seritan, S., Bannwarth, C., Fales, B. S., Hohenstein, E. G., Isborn, C. M., Kokkila‐Schumacher, S. I. L., Li, X., Liu, F., Luehr, N., Snyder, J. W., et al. (2021) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1494 · Cited by 312
Janet, J. P., Ramesh, S., Duan, C., & Kulik, H. J. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00026 · Cited by 200
Kim, C. Y., Mitchell, A. J., Kastner, D. W., Albright, C. E., Gutierrez, M. A., Glinkerman, C. M., Kulik, H. J., & Weng, J.-K. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36299-1 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Lange, A. W., & Herbert, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-12-28
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 244111-244111
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2018707926
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A smooth, nonsingular, and faithful discretization scheme for polarizable continuum models: The switching/Gaussian approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3511297
- The paper
- Lange, A. W., & Herbert, J. M. (2010). A smooth, nonsingular, and faithful discretization scheme for polarizable continuum models: The switching/Gaussian approach. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3511297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.