Cited by 82Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In situ transmission electron microscopy analysis of conductive filament during solid electrolyte resistance switching

Open access
Fujii, Takashi, Arita, Masashi, Takahashi, Yasuo, Fujiwara, Ichiro·2011·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

An in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of a solid electrolyte, Cu–GeS, during resistance switching is reported. Real-time observations of the filament formation and disappearance process were performed in the TEM instrument and the conductive-filament-formation model was confirmed experimentally. Narrow conductive filaments were formed corresponding to resistance switching from high- to low-resistance states. When the resistance changed to high-resistance state, the filament disappeared. It was also confirmed by use of selected area diffractometry and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy that the conductive filament was made of nanocrystals composed mainly of Cu.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3593494

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent in-situ TEM studies have only focused on a small range of materials, mostly chalcogenide-based, without detailed analytical TEM characterizations.

    “Recent attempts using in-situ TEM studies 20,21 have only focused on a small range of materials (mostly chalcogenide-based) without detailed analytical TEM characterizations.”

    From Observation of conducting filament growth in nanoscale resistive memories (2012) · cites this paper as [21]

    The paper does study a chalcogenide-based Cu-GeS device, but it directly contradicts the claim that the study lacked detailed analytical TEM characterization. Its introduction (page not specified in the supplied passages) says it used SAD and EDX to clarify the filament’s structure and composition; the results passages report diffraction patterns and EDX composition estimates. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For many devices, the resistive switching effect is caused by the formation of conducting filaments.

    “For many devices, the resistive switching effect is believed to be caused by the formation of conducting filaments 16-21 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2005, Proceedings of IEEE Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium
  2. 2006, Proceedings of IEEE Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium
  3. Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet., 2007, 783
  4. Dig. Tech. Pap. - Symp. VLSI Technol., 2009, 204

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fujii, T., Arita, M., Takahashi, Y., & Fujiwara, I.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Hokkaido University 1 Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, , Sapporo 060-0814, Japan
  • Semiconductor Technology Academic Research Center (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2011-05-23
Volume
98
Issue
21
Pages
212104
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2032500223
Cited by
82
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hokkaido University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21560681)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
Keywords
conductive filaments, resistive switching, solid electrolytes, in situ transmission electron microscopy, nanocrystals, copper, resistive random access memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review