The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Band offsets and optical bowings of chalcopyrites and Zn-based II-VI alloys
Abstract
Using first-principles band-structure theory we have systematically calculated the (i) alloy bowing coefficients, (ii) alloy mixing enthalpies, and (iii) interfacial valence- and conduction-band offsets for three mixed-anion (CuInX2, X=S, Se, Te) and three mixed-cation (CuMSe2, M=Al, Ga, In) chalcopyrite systems. The random chalcopyrite alloys are represented by special quasirandom structures (SQS). The calculated bowing coefficients are in good agreement with the most recent experimental data for stoichiometric alloys. Results for the mixing enthalpies and the band offsets are provided as predictions to be tested experimentally. Comparing our calculated bowing and band offsets for the mixed-anion chalcopyrite alloys with those of the corresponding Zn chalcogenide alloys (ZnX, X=S, Se, Te), we find that the larger p−d coupling in chalcopyrite alloys reduces their band offsets and optical bowing. Bowing parameters for ordered, Zn-based II-VI alloys in the CuAu, CuPt, and chalcopyrite structures are presented: we find that ordered Zn2SeTe has bowing coefficients of 1.44 and 3.15 eV in the CuAu and CuPt structures, while the random ZnSexTe1−x alloy has a bowing of 1.14 eV. The band alignment between CuInSe2 and CuInSe2-derived ordered vacancy compounds are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Self-citationBond lengths around isovalent impurities and in semiconductor solid solutions
Martins, J. L., & Zunger, A. (1984) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.30.6217 · Cited by 435
Self-citation
Cited by
Giant and Composition-Dependent Optical Bowing Coefficient in GaAsN Alloys
Wei, S.-H., & Zunger, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.664 · Cited by 549
Self-citationWide Band Gap Chalcogenide Semiconductors
Woods-Robinson, R., Han, Y., Zhang, H., Ablekim, T., Khan, I., Persson, K. A., & Zakutayev, A. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00600 · Cited by 513
Progress and prospects for ultrathin solar cells
Massiot, I., Cattoni, A., & Collin, S. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00714-4 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, S.-H., & Zunger, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-09-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3846-3856
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2046527111
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Band offsets and optical bowings of chalcopyrites and Zn-based II-VI alloys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.359901
- The paper
- Wei, S.-H., & Zunger, A. (1995). Band offsets and optical bowings of chalcopyrites and Zn-based II-VI alloys. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.359901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.