CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Light interference detection on-chip by integrated SNSPD counters

Cavalier, Paul, Villégier, Jean-Claude, Feautrier, Philippe, Constancias, Christophe, Morand, Alain·2011·AIP Advances
DOI 10.1063/1.3656744
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A SWIFTS device (Stationary Wave Integrated Fourier Transform Spectrometer) has been realized with an array of 24 Superconducting Nanowire Single Photon Detectors (SNSPD), on-chip integrated under a Si3N4 monomode rib-waveguide interferometer. Colored light around 1.55μm wavelength is introduced through end-fire coupling, producing a counter-propagative stationary interferogram over the 40nm wide, 120nm spaced, 4nm thick epi-NbN nanowire array. Modulations in the source bandwidth have been detected using individual waveguide coupled SNSPDs operating in single photon counting mode, which is a step towards light spectrum reconstruction by inverse Fourier transform of the stationary wave intensity. We report the design, fabrication process and in-situ measurement at 4.2K of light power modulation in the interferometer, obtained with variable laser wavelength. Such micro-SWIFTS configuration with 160nm sampling period over 3.84μm distance allows a spectral bandwidth of 2μm and a wavelength resolution of 170nm. The light interferences direct sampling ability is unique and raises wide interest with several potential applications like fringe-tracking, metrology, cryptography or optical tomography.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3656744

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First demonstrations of quantum networks have been made in Austria, China, Japan, Switzerland, and USA.

    “This challenge already counts first demonstrations in Austria [309], China [311,312], Japan [313,314], Switzerland [310] and USA [308,315] (see Table 4).”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [312]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 2007, Nature Photonics, 1, 473, 10.1038/nphoton.2007.138 · DOI
  2. 2008, Proceedings of SPIE, 7010, 701046, 10.1117/12.788913 · DOI
  3. 1891, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris), 274
  4. 1894, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris), 92
  5. 2010, International Conference on Space Optics, Rhodes
  6. 2010, Journal of Applied Physics, 107, 116103, 10.1063/1.3374636 · DOI
  7. 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 21, 327, 10.1109/TASC.2010.2086039 · DOI
  8. 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 19, 3375, 10.1109/TASC.2009.2019243 · DOI
  9. 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 19, 336, 10.1109/TASC.2009.2018035 · DOI
  10. 1997, Optical and Quantum Electronics, 29, 907, 10.1023/A:1018581701193 · DOI
  11. 2010, Proceedings of SPIE
  12. Paul Cavalier, Ph.D Thesis Grenoble University - Direct Sampling of Light Interferences with Superconducting Nanodetectors for the Realization of a SWIFTS Microspectrometer, May 2011.
  13. 2006, Applied Physics Letters, 88, 111, 10.1063/1.2183810 · DOI
  14. 2007, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 25, 2041, 10.1116/1.2806965 · DOI
  15. 2008, Optics Express, 16, 10750, 10.1364/OE.16.010750 · DOI
  16. 2002, Optics Communications, 210, 43, 10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01681-4 · DOI
  17. 2009, Proceedings of SPIE, 72490Q, 10.1117/12.806198 · DOI
  18. 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 21, 102, 10.1109/TASC.2010.2090837 · DOI
  19. 2009, Optics Express, 17, 12, 10.1364/OE.17.001976 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cavalier, P., Villégier, J.-C., Feautrier, P., Constancias, C., & Morand, A.
Venue
AIP Advances
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
1
Issue
4
ISSN
2158-3226
DOI
10.1063/1.3656744
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review