Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, $\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases

Open access
Marshall, Michael S., Burns, Lori A., Sherrill, C. David·2011·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

In benchmark-quality studies of non-covalent interactions, it is common to estimate interaction energies at the complete basis set (CBS) coupled-cluster through perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] level of theory by adding to CBS second-order perturbation theory (MP2) a “coupled-cluster correction,” \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T), evaluated in a modest basis set. This work illustrates that commonly used basis sets such as 6-31G*(0.25) can yield large, even wrongly signed, errors for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T) that vary significantly by binding motif. Double-ζ basis sets show more reliable results when used with explicitly correlated methods to form a \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}-{\rm F}12}^{\text{CCSD(T}^*)-{\rm F}12}$\end{document}δMP2−F12CCSD(T*)−F12 correction, yielding a mean absolute deviation of 0.11 kcal mol−1 for the S22 test set. Examining the coupled-cluster correction for basis sets up to sextuple-ζ in quality reveals that \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T) converges monotonically only beyond a turning point at triple-ζ or quadruple-ζ quality. In consequence, CBS extrapolation of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T) corrections before the turning point, generally CBS (aug-cc-pVDZ,aug-cc-pVTZ), are found to be unreliable and often inferior to aug-cc-pVTZ alone, especially for hydrogen-bonding systems. Using the findings of this paper, we revise some recent benchmarks for non-covalent interactions, namely the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG test sets. The maximum differences in the revised benchmarks are 0.080, 0.060, 0.257, and 0.102 kcal mol−1, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3659142

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Marshall, M. S., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
135
Issue
19
Pages
194102-194102
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2082507509
Cited by
351
References
39
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, $\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3659142
The paper
Marshall, M. S., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D. (2011). Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, $\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3659142

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.