The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, $\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases
Open accessAbstract
In benchmark-quality studies of non-covalent interactions, it is common to estimate interaction energies at the complete basis set (CBS) coupled-cluster through perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] level of theory by adding to CBS second-order perturbation theory (MP2) a “coupled-cluster correction,” \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T), evaluated in a modest basis set. This work illustrates that commonly used basis sets such as 6-31G*(0.25) can yield large, even wrongly signed, errors for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T) that vary significantly by binding motif. Double-ζ basis sets show more reliable results when used with explicitly correlated methods to form a \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}-{\rm F}12}^{\text{CCSD(T}^*)-{\rm F}12}$\end{document}δMP2−F12CCSD(T*)−F12 correction, yielding a mean absolute deviation of 0.11 kcal mol−1 for the S22 test set. Examining the coupled-cluster correction for basis sets up to sextuple-ζ in quality reveals that \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T) converges monotonically only beyond a turning point at triple-ζ or quadruple-ζ quality. In consequence, CBS extrapolation of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$\end{document}δMP2CCSD(T) corrections before the turning point, generally CBS (aug-cc-pVDZ,aug-cc-pVTZ), are found to be unreliable and often inferior to aug-cc-pVTZ alone, especially for hydrogen-bonding systems. Using the findings of this paper, we revise some recent benchmarks for non-covalent interactions, namely the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG test sets. The maximum differences in the revised benchmarks are 0.080, 0.060, 0.257, and 0.102 kcal mol−1, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boys, S. F., & Bernardi, F. (1970) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268977000101561 · Cited by 22,188
Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O
Halkier, A., Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., Klopper, W., Koch, H., Olsen, J., & Wilson, A. K. (1998) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00111-0 · Cited by 2,192
A simple and efficient CCSD(T)-F12 approximation
Adler, T. B., Knizia, G., & Werner, H.-J. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2817618 · Cited by 2,001
Simplified CCSD(T)-F12 methods: Theory and benchmarks
Knizia, G., Adler, T. B., & Werner, H.-J. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3054300 · Cited by 1,996
Definition of the hydrogen bond (IUPAC Recommendations 2011)
Arunan, E., Desiraju, G. R., Klein, R. A., Sadlej, J., Scheiner, S., Alkorta, I., Clary, D. C., Crabtree, R. H., Dannenberg, J. J., Hobza, P., et al. (2011) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rec-10-01-02 · Cited by 1,886
Jurečka, P., Šponer, J., Černý, J., & Hobza, P. (2006) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/b600027d · Cited by 1,852
Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions: The Benzene Dimer
Sinnokrot, M. O., Valeev, E. F., & Sherrill, C. D. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja025896h · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationTsuzuki, S., Honda, K., Uchimaru, T., Mikami, M., & Tanabe, K. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0105212 · Cited by 1,070
S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures
Řezáč, J., Riley, K. E., & Hobza, P. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct2002946 · Cited by 1,019
High-Accuracy Quantum Mechanical Studies of π−π Interactions in Benzene Dimers
Sinnokrot, M. O., & Sherrill, C. D. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0610416 · Cited by 773
Self-citation
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Goerigk, L., Hansen, A., Bauer, C., Ehrlich, S., Najibi, A., & Grimme, S. (2017) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c7cp04913g · Cited by 1,894
Dispersion-Corrected Mean-Field Electronic Structure Methods
Grimme, S., Hansen, A., Brandenburg, J. G., & Bannwarth, C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00533 · Cited by 1,621
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Revised Damping Parameters for the D3 Dispersion Correction to Density Functional Theory
Smith, D. G. A., Burns, L. A., Patkowski, K., & Sherrill, C. D. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00780 · Cited by 532
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, M. S., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-11-15
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 194102-194102
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2082507509
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, $\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3659142
- The paper
- Marshall, M. S., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D. (2011). Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, $\delta _{\text{MP2}}^{\text{CCSD(T)}}$δMP2CCSD(T): Best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3659142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.