The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of pulse duration on mechanical effects after laser-induced breakdown in water
Abstract
The influence of the pulse duration on the mechanical effects following laser-induced breakdown in water was studied at pulse durations between 100 fs and 100 ns. Breakdown was generated by focusing laser pulses into a cuvette containing distilled water. The pulse energy corresponded to 6-times breakdown threshold energy. Plasma formation and shock wave emission were studied photographically. The plasma photographs show a strong influence of self-focusing on the plasma geometry for femtosecond pulses. Streak photographic recording of the shock propagation in the immediate vicinity of the breakdown region allowed the measurement of the near-field shock pressure. At the plasma rim, shock pressures between 3 and 9 GPa were observed for most pulse durations. The shock pressure rapidly decays proportionally to r−(2⋯3) with increasing distance r from the optical axis. At a 6 mm distance of the shock pressure has dropped to (8.5±0.6) MPa for 76 ns and to <0.1 MPa for femtosecond pulses. The radius of the cavitation bubble is reduced from 2.5 mm (76 ns pulses) to less than 50 μm for femtosecond pulses. Mechanical effects such as shock wave emission and cavitation bubble expansion are greatly reduced for shorter laser pulses, because the energy required to produce breakdown decreases with decreasing pulse duration, and because a larger fraction of energy is required to overcome the heat of vaporization with femtosecond pulses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vogel, A., Nahen, K., Theisen, D., & Noack, J. (1996) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/2944.577307 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Cited by
Mechanisms of Pulsed Laser Ablation of Biological Tissues
Vogel, A., & Venugopalan, V. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010379n · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationNoack, J., & Vogel, A. (1999) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.777215 · Cited by 618
Self-citationVogel, A., Linz, N., Freidank, S., & Paltauf, G. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.038102 · Cited by 322
Self-citationMechanisms and processes of pulsed laser ablation in liquids during nanoparticle production
DellʼAglio, M., Gaudiuso, R., De Pascale, O., & De Giacomo, A. (2015) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.082 · Cited by 270
Shock Wave Emission by Laser Generated Bubbles
Lauterborn, W., & Vogel, A. (2013) · Bubble Dynamics and Shock Waves · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34297-4_3 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Noack, J., Hammer, D. X., Noojin, G. D., Rockwell, B. A., & Vogel, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-06-15
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7488-7495
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2021613351
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of pulse duration on mechanical effects after laser-induced breakdown in water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.367512
- The paper
- Noack, J., Hammer, D. X., Noojin, G. D., Rockwell, B. A., & Vogel, A. (1998). Influence of pulse duration on mechanical effects after laser-induced breakdown in water. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.