The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Femtosecond-Laser-Induced Nanocavitation in Water: Implications for Optical Breakdown Threshold and Cell Surgery
Abstract
We determined the bubble radius ${R}_{\mathrm{max}}$ for femtosecond optical breakdown in water at 347, 520, and 1040 nm with an unprecedented accuracy ($\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}10\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{nm}$). At threshold, ${R}_{\mathrm{max}}$ was smaller than the diffraction-limited focus radius and ranged from 190 nm to 320 nm. The increase of ${R}_{\mathrm{max}}$ with laser energy ${E}_{L}$ is slowest at 347 nm, providing optimum control of cell surgery. Experimental results agree with a model of bubble formation in heated and thermoelastically stretched liquids. Theory predicts a threshold temperature ${T}_{\mathrm{th}}\ensuremath{\approx}168\text{ }\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\mathrm{C}$. For $T>300\text{ }\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\mathrm{C}$, a phase explosion sets in, and ${R}_{\mathrm{max}}$ increases rapidly with ${E}_{L}$.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lifetime and maximum height of a cavitation bubble depend on laser fluence, pulse width, number of irradiated pulses at the same spot, liquid density, liquid layer thickness, liquid viscosity, target geometry, and liquid compressibility.
“The lifetime and maximum height of a cavitation bubble depend on many factors, including laser fluence, 76 pulse width, 76,139,140 number of irradiated pulses at the same spot, 141,142 liquid density, 143 the thickness of liquid layer, 144 liquid viscosity, 145 target geometry, 100 and liquid compressibility.146”
From Green nanoparticle synthesis at scale: a perspective on overcoming the limits of pulsed laser ablation in liquids for high-throughput production (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1007/s00340-005-2036-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00169-7 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.415878 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.078103 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.158104 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.367512 · DOI
- 10.1364/OL.26.000093 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.15.010303 · DOI
- A. Vogel, 1999, Appl. Opt., 38, 3636, 10.1364/AO.38.003636 · DOI
- C. B. Schaffer, 2002, Opt. Express, 10, 196, 10.1364/OE.10.000196 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00050-6 · DOI
- Lord Rayleigh, 1917, Philos. Mag., 34, 94, 10.1080/14786440808635681 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2217158 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr010379n · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amendola, V., & Meneghetti, M. (2013) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c2cp42895d · Cited by 758
Ibrahimkutty, S., Wagener, P., Menzel, A., Plech, A., & Barcikowski, S. (2012) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4750250 · Cited by 203
Pulsed Laser Ablation of Zinc in Tetrahydrofuran: Bypassing the Cavitation Bubble
Wagener, P., Schwenke, A., Chichkov, B. N., & Barcikowski, S. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp911243a · Cited by 133
Khairani, I. Y., Mínguez-Vega, G., Doñate-Buendía, C., & Gökce, B. (2023) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d3cp01214j · Cited by 130
Doñate-Buendía, C., Fernández-Alonso, M., Lancis, J., & Mínguez-Vega, G. (2019) · Photonics Research · doi:10.1364/prj.7.001249 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogel, A., Linz, N., Freidank, S., & Paltauf, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-01-23
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 038102-038102
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2046486819
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 23.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
- Keywords
- nanobubble formation, optical breakdown threshold, bubble radius, cell surgery, water, laser wavelength dependence, laser energy dependence, temperature thresholds, phase explosion
- MeSH terms
- Lasers, Subcellular Fractions, Thermodynamics, Water, Nanotechnology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review