The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Slip length of water on graphene: Limitations of non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations
Open accessAbstract
Data for the flow rate of water in carbon nanopores is widely scattered, both in experiments and simulations. In this work, we aim at precisely quantifying the characteristic large slip length and flow rate of water flowing in a planar graphene nanochannel. First, we quantify the slip length using the intrinsic interfacial friction coefficient between water and graphene, which is found from equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simulations. We then calculate the flow rate and the slip length from the streaming velocity profiles obtained using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations and compare with the predictions from the EMD simulations. The slip length calculated from NEMD simulations is found to be extremely sensitive to the curvature of the velocity profile and it possesses large statistical errors. We therefore pose the question: Can a micrometer range slip length be reliably determined using velocity profiles obtained from NEMD simulations? Our answer is “not practical, if not impossible” based on the analysis given as the results. In the case of high slip systems such as water in carbon nanochannels, the EMD method results are more reliable, accurate, and computationally more efficient compared to the direct NEMD method for predicting the nanofluidic flow rate and hydrodynamic boundary condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Ultrafast viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes
Huang, H., Song, Z., Wei, N., Shi, L., Mao, Y., Ying, Y., Sun, L., Xu, Z., & Peng, X. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3979 · Cited by 800
High-Flux Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membrane Intercalated by Carbon Nanotubes
Han, Y., Jiang, Y., & Gao, C. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b00986 · Cited by 532
Graphene membranes for water desalination
Homaeigohar, S., & Elbahri, M. (2017) · NPG Asia Materials · doi:10.1038/am.2017.135 · Cited by 444
How fast does water flow in carbon nanotubes?
Kannam, S. K., Todd, B. D., Hansen, J. S., & Daivis, P. J. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4793396 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar Kannam, S., Todd, B. D., Hansen, J. S., & Daivis, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-01-13
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 024705-024705
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1978096167
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slip length of water on graphene: Limitations of non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3675904
- The paper
- Kumar Kannam, S., Todd, B. D., Hansen, J. S., & Daivis, P. J. (2012). Slip length of water on graphene: Limitations of non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3675904
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.