The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Piecewise polynomial configuration interaction natural orbital study of 1 s 2 helium
Abstract
We report here an analysis of extensive configuration interaction (CI) wave functions for the 1s2 ground state of the helium atom using piecewise polynomial basis functions. Large numbers of natural radial orbitals (NROs) with l ranging from 0 to 11 have been treated accurately and analyzed systematically. The contribution of each NRO to the total energy is found to follow the formula ΔE∼−0.42(l+1/2) × (n−1/2)−6a.u., where n is the principal quantum number, and the expansion coefficient of the NRO configuration is found to follow the formula, c∼−0.35(l+1/2)2/3 (n−1/2)−4. (The constants for l=0 are a little different). From an examination of the tails of the NROs, we are able to suggest an l-dependent universal asymptotic formula, rβ−l−1+δe−ζr, where β is a constant, where δ=δl0, and where ζ2/2 is the ionization potential. The nodes of the NROs are also found to behave in a systematic way that yields valuable information on the choice of basis functions. So-called ’’L’’-limit energies EL, more accurate than any we could find in the literature, have been determined for L=0 through 11, with a final CI energy calculated here of −2.90370 a.u. from a wave function containing 118 NROs. The increments EL−EL−1 are found to follow the formula −0.0740(L+1/2)−4−0.031 (L+1/2)−5 a.u., which is useful for extrapolation and extension of the CI energy by two significant digits. The n- and l-dependent formulas for the energy contributions make it possible to estimate the size of a CI calculation required for a given accuracy. The high accuracy of these CI calculations is made possible by the flexibility and numerical stability of piecewise polynomial basis functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
In pursuit of the ab initio limit for conformational energy prototypes
Császár, A. G., Allen, W. D., & Schaefer, H. F. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476449 · Cited by 718
Applications of B-splines in atomic and molecular physics
Bachau, H., Cormier, E., Decleva, P., Hansen, J. E., & Martín, F. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/12/205 · Cited by 709
Kutzelnigg, W., & Klopper, W. (1991) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.459921 · Cited by 585
Explicitly Correlated R12/F12 Methods for Electronic Structure
Kong, L., Bischoff, F. A., & Valeev, E. F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200204r · Cited by 509
Rates of convergence of the partial-wave expansions of atomic correlation energies
Kutzelnigg, W., & Morgan, J. D. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462811 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, D. P., Silverstone, H. J., & Metzger, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1979-11-15
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4142-4163
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2006204334
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Piecewise polynomial configuration interaction natural orbital study of 1 s 2 helium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.438187
- The paper
- Carroll, D. P., Silverstone, H. J., & Metzger, R. M. (1979). Piecewise polynomial configuration interaction natural orbital study of 1 s 2 helium. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.