Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rates of convergence of the partial-wave expansions of atomic correlation energies

Kutzelnigg, Werner, Morgan, John D.·1992·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The coefficients of the leading terms of the partial-wave expansion of atomic correlation energies in powers of (l+1/2)−1 are derived for the second- and third-order perturbed energies in the 1/Z expansion for all possible states of two-electron atoms, and for second-order Mo/ller–Plesset (many-body perturbation) theory for arbitrary n-electron atoms. The expressions for these coefficients given in Table I involve simple integrals over the zeroth-order wave functions (for the third order energies first-order wave functions are also involved). The leading term of E(2) goes as (l+1/2)−4 for natural parity singlet states, as (l+1/2)−6 for triplet states, and as (l+1/2)−8 for unnatural parity singlet states. There are no odd powers of (l+1/2)−1 present in E(2), and the coefficient of the (l+1/2)−6 term for natural parity singlet states of two-electron systems in the 1/Z expansion is generally −5/4 times the coefficient of the (l+1/2)−4 term. In E(3) there are terms that go as odd powers of (l+1/2)−1; the leading term is expressible in terms of the zeroth-order wave function and goes as (l+1/2)−5 for natural parity singlet states, as (l+1/2)−7 for triplet states, and as (l+1/2)−9 for unnatural parity singlet states. Numerical values of the coefficients for E(2) in two-electron atoms are given in Table II. The relation of our results to those obtained by Hill for variational calculations on the He ground state is discussed and generalizations of Hill’s formulas are conjectured. The unexpected results for unnatural parity singlet states are traced back to the behavior of their wave functions at the point of coalescence of two electrons. In terms of the relative coordinate of the two electrons they represent d waves, in contrast to s waves for natural parity singlet states and p waves for triplet states of either parity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.462811

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Kutzelnigg, W., & Morgan, J. D.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1992-03-15
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
4484-4508
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2069342338
Cited by
498
References
22
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates of convergence of the partial-wave expansions of atomic correlation energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.462811
The paper
Kutzelnigg, W., & Morgan, J. D. (1992). Rates of convergence of the partial-wave expansions of atomic correlation energies. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.462811

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.