Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extensive theoretical studies of the hydrogen-bonded complexes (H2O)2, (H2O)2H+, (HF)2, (HF)2H+, F2H−, and (NH3)2

Frisch, Michael J., Del Bene, Janet E., Binkley, J. Stephen, Schaefer, Henry F.·1986·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The structures and binding energies of the complexes (H2O)2, (H2O)2H+, (HF)2, (HF)2H+, F2H−, and (NH3)2 have been examined using much higher levels of theory than has been previously applied to these systems. These methods including large basis sets and full optimization of structures with the effects of electron correlation included, are known to give single bond energies to an accuracy of about 2 kcal mol−1 and are found in this study to give excellent agreement with the extensive experimental data available for the hydrogen fluoride and water dimers. The Cs open form of ammonia dimer remains a very shallow minimum energy structure at these levels, in agreement with previous theoretical results but seemingly in disagreement with experiment. The theoretical enthalpy of association of H5O+2 is found to be −35.0 kcal mol−1, in slight disagreement with the most recent experimental results, but in accord with earlier ones, which suggests that these experiments should be reexamined. The enthalpy of association of H2F+ is predicted to be −33.5 kcal mol−1, and that of F− with HF to be −46.4 kcal mol−1. A study of the effects of basis set expansion on the structure of the water dimer shows that the structure is much more sensitive to basis set at the Hartree–Fock level than when correlation is included. A valence triple-zeta basis plus two sets of first polarization functions and one set of diffuse functions appears to be necessary to approach the Hartree–Fock limiting structure. Counterpoise estimates of the effects of basis set deficiencies on the structure and binding energy of this complex are shown to be misleading. Examination of the complexes (HF)2, (H2O)2, (NH3)2, (H2O)2H+, (HF)2H+, and F2H− at the MP4/6-311++G(3df ,3pd)//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) level of theory indicates that previous studies using fourth order perturbation theory with some smaller basis sets and Hartree–Fock optimized structures are likely to be reliable, although part of the agreement reflects a cancellation of error. HF/6-31+G(d) estimates of zero-point vibrational energy contributions to association energies are found to be satisfactory for asymmetric complexes, but can both over and underestimate the contribution of this term for symmetrically bound complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.450390

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 672

Metadata

Authors
Frisch, M. J., Del Bene, J. E., Binkley, J. S., & Schaefer, H. F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1986-02-15
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
2279-2289
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1982855438
Cited by
672
References
1
FWCI
17.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extensive theoretical studies of the hydrogen-bonded complexes (H2O)2, (H2O)2H+, (HF)2, (HF)2H+, F2H−, and (NH3)2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.450390
The paper
Frisch, M. J., Del Bene, J. E., Binkley, J. S., & Schaefer, H. F. (1986). Extensive theoretical studies of the hydrogen-bonded complexes (H2O)2, (H2O)2H+, (HF)2, (HF)2H+, F2H−, and (NH3)2. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.450390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.