The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of systematic sequences of wave functions to the water dimer
Abstract
A systematic series of calculations encompassing a wide range of basis sets and correlated methods has been used to estimate the complete basis set, full CI hydrogen bond strength in the water dimer system. The largest basis set included up through h polarization functions on oxygen and g functions on hydrogen. The complete basis set limit for the self-consistent-field (SCF) interaction energy is estimated to be −3.55 kcal/mol with an accompanying correlation contribution of ∼−1.5 kcal/mol. This leads to an interaction energy of −5.1 kcal/mol, exclusive of vibrational zero-point considerations, and is in good agreement with experimental measurements of −5.4±0.7 kcal/mol. Inclusion of an approximate adjustment for the basis set superposition error via the Boys/Bernardi counterpoise correction was found to substantially improve agreement with ΔE∞, our estimate of the complete basis set interaction energy, at the both the SCF and correlated levels for basis sets that were lacking in sufficient near-valence diffuse functions. For diffuse-function-augmented basis sets, application of the CP correction was found to sometimes worsen agreement with ΔE∞.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Explicitly Correlated R12/F12 Methods for Electronic Structure
Kong, L., Bischoff, F. A., & Valeev, E. F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200204r · Cited by 509
Bryantsev, V. S., Diallo, M. S., van Duin, A. C. T., & Goddard, W. A. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct800549f · Cited by 403
Zhan, C.-G., & Dixon, D. A. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0311512 · Cited by 191
The history and evolution of configuration interaction
SHAVITT, I. (1998) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/002689798168303 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Feller, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1992-04-15
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6104-6114
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2064484346
- Cited by
- 1,122
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.