The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A computer simulation study of the liquid–vapor coexistence curve of water
Abstract
The liquid–vapor coexistence curve of a model water (the extended simple point charge model, SPCE) is evaluated by molecular dynamics simulation in the (N,V,E) ensemble. It is shown that the simulated system (N=256 water molecules) is too small to present a spinodal decomposition and, hence, can be described by a classical equation of state whose the critical parameters (Tc=651.7 K, ρc=0.326 g/cm3, and Pc=189 bar) are found to be very close to that of real water (Tc=647.13 K, ρc=0.322 g/cm3, and Pc=220.55 bar). The critical parameters for SPCE water in the thermodynamic limit are deduced from the simulation data employing Wegner type expansions for the order parameter and the coexistence curve diameter; here also the values of the critical parameters (Tc=640 K, ρc=0.29 g/cm3, and Pc=160 bar) are close to that of real water. The temperature dependence of the dielectric constant for water and steam at orthobaric densities is next evaluated between ambient and Tc; the agreement with the experimental data is quite remarkable (e.g., εSPCE=81.0 at 300 K and εSPCE=6. at Tc instead of 78.0 and 5.3, respectively, in real water). The modifications experienced by water’s architecture with the temperature are deduced from the evaluation of the atom–atom correlation functions. It is shown that a structural change occurs in the temperature range 423–473 K. This important reorganization is characterized by a shift of the second shell of neighbors from 4.5 to 5.5 A and the loss of almost all angular correlations beyond the first solvation shell. Moreover, it is observed that the average number of hydrogen bonds per molecule nHB scales with the density all along the saturation curve. In the same way the values of nHB for orthobaric densities seems to follow a law analogous to the law of rectilinear diameter for orthobaric densities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Critical Parameter Values for H2O and D2O
Sengers, J. M. H. L., Straub, J., Watanabe, K., & Hill, P. G. (1985) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555746 · Cited by 74
Cited by
van der Spoel, D., van Maaren, P. J., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476482 · Cited by 659
Supercooled water and the kinetic glass transition
Sciortino, F., Gallo, P., Tartaglia, P., & Chen, S. H. (1996) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.54.6331 · Cited by 355
Slow Dynamics of Water Molecules in Supercooled States
Gallo, P., Sciortino, F., Tartaglia, P., & Chen, S.-H. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.2730 · Cited by 304
Reimer, J., Steele-MacInnis, M., Wambach, J. M., & Vogel, F. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03192 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Guissani, Y., & Guillot, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1993-05-15
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 8221-8235
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2005773884
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A computer simulation study of the liquid–vapor coexistence curve of water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.464527
- The paper
- Guissani, Y., & Guillot, B. (1993). A computer simulation study of the liquid–vapor coexistence curve of water. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.