The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Separation-shifted scaling, a new scaling method for Lennard-Jones interactions in thermodynamic integration
Abstract
A new method of simultaneously scaling and shifting the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential in molecular dynamics (MD) and thermodynamic integration (TI) simulations is presented. The approach allows the smooth creation or annihilation of atoms or molecules in an ensemble of solvent molecules during a molecular simulation. By scaling and shifting the LJ potential in the direction of the interatomic distance between particles, the method eliminates the problem of the creation or annihilation of a large repulsive LJ potential at the initial or final state of a TI. The optimal degree of shifting and scaling the LJ potential as a function of a control variable λ was studied for the annihilation and creation of neon in aqueous solution. The method was further tested on the calculation of the free energy of aqueous solvation of a small molecule, ethanol. In contrast to linear scaling of the LJ potential during TI, the calculated free energies using the new separation-shifted scaling approach are reasonably well converged after 200–500 ps of simulation and show smaller hysteresis comparing forward and reverse TI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Absolute Binding Free Energies: A Quantitative Approach for Their Calculation
Boresch, S., Tettinger, F., Leitgeb, M., & Karplus, M. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0217839 · Cited by 569
Biomolecular Modeling: Goals, Problems, Perspectives
van Gunsteren, W. F., Bakowies, D., Baron, R., Chandrasekhar, I., Christen, M., Daura, X., Gee, P., Geerke, D. P., Glättli, A., Hünenberger, P. H., et al. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200502655 · Cited by 561
Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations
Klimovich, P. V., Shirts, M. R., & Mobley, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9 · Cited by 490
Standard Binding Free Energies from Computer Simulations: What Is the Best Strategy?
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct3008099 · Cited by 343
Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems
Zheng, L., Chen, M., & Yang, W. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810631106 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharias, M., Straatsma, T. P., & McCammon, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-06-15
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 9025-9031
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2077954341
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation-shifted scaling, a new scaling method for Lennard-Jones interactions in thermodynamic integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.466707
- The paper
- Zacharias, M., Straatsma, T. P., & McCammon, J. A. (1994). Separation-shifted scaling, a new scaling method for Lennard-Jones interactions in thermodynamic integration. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.