Vibration considerations for cryogenic tanks using glass bubbles insulation
Abstract
The use of glass bubbles as an efficient and practical thermal insulation system hasbeen previously demonstrated in cryogenic storage tanks. One such example is a spherical,vacuum-jacketed liquid hydrogen vessel of 218,000 liter capacity where the boiloff rate hasbeen reduced by approximately 50 percent. Further applications may include non-stationarytanks such as mobile tankers and tanks with extreme duty cycles or exposed to significantvibration environments. Space rocket launch events and mobile tanker life cycles representtwo harsh cases of mechanical vibration exposure. A number of bulk fill insulationmaterials including glass bubbles, perlite powders, and aerogel granules were tested forvibration effects and mechanical behavior using a custom design holding fixture subjectedto random vibration on an Electrodynamic Shaker. The settling effects for mixtures ofinsulation materials were also investigated. The vibration test results and granular particleanalysis are presented with considerations and implications for future cryogenic tankapplications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Glass bubbles do not compact under crush, vibration, and settling tests.
“The conclusions were consistent across all tests: bubbles are better; bubbles do not compact; bubbles do not break; bubbles are easy to manage.”
From Energy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
The glass bubbles system was determined to perform reliably in annular space applications including large-scale spheres.
“Based on 15 years of research, testing, and development by a national team led by the Cryogenics Test Laboratory, this glass bubble system was determined to perform reliably in annular space applications including large-scale spheres.”
From Energy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Glass bubbles do not break under crush, vibration, and settling tests.
“The conclusions were consistent across all tests: bubbles are better; bubbles do not compact; bubbles do not break; bubbles are easy to manage.”
From Energy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen
Fesmire, J., Swanger, A., Jacobson, J., & Notardonato, W. (2022) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1240/1/012088 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“isostatic and point-to-point, as well as numerous types of vibration and settling tests [15,16].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Werlink, R. J., Fesmire, J., & Sass, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Kennedy Space Center (US)
- Venue
- AIP Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- AIP
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 55-65
- ISSN
- 0094-243X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974692168
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
- NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Keywords
- cryogenic storage tanks, hollow glass microspheres, thermal insulation, vibration effects, random vibration testing, liquid hydrogen storage, perlite
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review