Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electron correlation effects on the theoretical calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance spin–spin coupling constants

Perera, S. Ajith, Nooijen, Marcel, Bartlett, Rodney J.·1996·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The equation-of-motion coupled cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) method for general second-order properties is derived providing a quadratic, CI-like approximation and its linked form from coupled cluster (CC) energy derivative theory. The effects of the quadratic contribution, of the atomic basis set employed, and of electron correlation on NMR spin–spin coupling constant calculations using EOM-CCSD methods are investigated for a selected set of difficult molecules, notably CH3F, B2H6, CH3CN, C2H4, and CH3NH2. We find that the quadratic contribution is insignificant for the couplings in the molecules considered in this study and in addition the quadratic contribution only slightly depends on the basis set used. Therefore it seems well justified to use the less expensive CI-like approximation or its linked-diagram form to evaluate spin–spin coupling constants. The Fermi-contact contribution shows the largest variation with the change of basis sets. The diamagnetic spin–orbit (DSO) and the spin–dipole (SD) contribution vary little, seemingly being converged at the DZP level while the paramagnetic spin–orbit (PSO) term shows moderate variations. Except for very few cases, the FC contribution is dominant in all the couplings in the selected set of molecules and it is also most sensitive to the inclusion of electron correlation. The other contributions are less affected by electron correlation. Although of lesser importance, the significance of the noncontact contributions and electron correlation effects on accurate calculation of coupling constants such as 1J(13C19F) in CH3F and 1J(13C15N) in CH3CN is clearly demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.471092

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Perera, S. A., Nooijen, M., & Bartlett, R. J.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
104
Issue
9
Pages
3290-3305
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1988975994
Cited by
270
References
18
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron correlation effects on the theoretical calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance spin–spin coupling constants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.471092
The paper
Perera, S. A., Nooijen, M., & Bartlett, R. J. (1996). Electron correlation effects on the theoretical calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance spin–spin coupling constants. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.