The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energetics using the single point IMOMO (integrated molecular orbital+molecular orbital) calculations: Choices of computational levels and model system
Abstract
The integrated MO+MO (IMOMO) method, recently proposed for geometry optimization, is tested for accurate single point calculations. The principle idea of the IMOMO method is to reproduce results of a high level MO calculation for a large ‘‘real’’ system by dividing it into a small ‘‘model’’ system and the rest and applying different levels of MO theory for the two parts. Test examples are the activation barrier of the SN2 reaction of Cl−+alkyl chlorides, the C=C double bond dissociation of olefins and the energy of reaction for epoxidation of benzene. The effects of basis set and method in the lower level calculation as well as the effects of the choice of model system are investigated in detail. The IMOMO method gives an approximation to the high level MO energetics on the real system, in most cases with very small errors, with a small additional cost over the low level calculation. For instance, when the MP2 (Mo/ller–Plesset second-order perturbation) method is used as the lower level method, the IMOMO method reproduces the results of very high level MO method within 2 kcal/mol, with less than 50% of additional computer time, for the first two test examples. When the HF (Hartree–Fock) method is used as the lower level method, it is less accurate and depends more on the choice of model system, though the improvement over the HF energy is still very significant. Thus the IMOMO single point calculation provides a method for obtaining reliable local energetics such as bond energies and activation barriers for a large molecular system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Cited by
Vreven, T., Morokuma, K., Farkas, Ö., Schlegel, H. B., & Frisch, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10156 · Cited by 608
Self-citationOn the application of the IMOMO (integrated molecular orbital + molecular orbital) method
Vreven, T., & Morokuma, K. (2000) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/1096-987x(200012)21:16<1419::aid-jcc1>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 567
Self-citationNoodleman, L., Lovell, T., Han, W.-G., Li, J., & Himo, F. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020625a · Cited by 373
Polarization Energies in Oligoacene Semiconductor Crystals
Norton, J. E., & Brédas, J.-L. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8017797 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, M., Humbel, S., & Morokuma, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3654-3661
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1983148800
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energetics using the single point IMOMO (integrated molecular orbital+molecular orbital) calculations: Choices of computational levels and model system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.472235
- The paper
- Svensson, M., Humbel, S., & Morokuma, K. (1996). Energetics using the single point IMOMO (integrated molecular orbital+molecular orbital) calculations: Choices of computational levels and model system. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.472235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.