The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Site–site pair correlation functions of water from 25 to 400 °C: Revised analysis of new and old diffraction data
Abstract
Recent controversy in the literature about the structure of water away from ambient conditions is manifested by significant differences between the site–site pair correlation functions of water as derived from neutron diffraction data and the same quantities obtained in computer simulations using an effective pairwise potential for the intermolecular interactions. One possible explanation of the discrepancies between computer models of water and neutron diffraction results near the critical point is that they arise from uncertainties in the inelasticity correction, which is particularly large for light water. To test out this idea, a new method of obtaining the pair correlations is described. This new analysis method is applied both to the earlier neutron data on non-ambient water and on recently reported data for a range of densities at 573 K. For this newer data the incident neutron spectrum is derived from an ambient water moderator instead of the liquid methane (100 K) moderator of previous work, and this has the effect of altering the shape of the inelasticity distortion to the diffraction data. It is found that the resulting site–site correlation functions from different experiments are now closely consistent with one another, indicating that the inelasticity correction has been successfully performed by this new analysis. It is also demonstrated that the new site–site correlation functions can be generated from three-dimensional distributions of water molecules. The previously reported discrepancies between simulation and neutron data are not as severe with this new analysis, but there remain systematic trends with density and temperature which apparently are not reproduced by computer simulation with empirical pair potentials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roles of Water for Chemical Reactions in High-Temperature Water
Akiya, N., & Savage, P. E. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr000668w · Cited by 1,581
A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators
Lamoureux, G., MacKerell, A. D., & Roux, B. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1598191 · Cited by 688
van der Spoel, D., van Maaren, P. J., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476482 · Cited by 659
A high-quality x-ray scattering experiment on liquid water at ambient conditions
Hura, G., Sorenson, J. M., Glaeser, R. M., & Head-Gordon, T. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1319614 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Soper, A. K., Bruni, F., & Ricci, M. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 247-254
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2045238980
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Site–site pair correlation functions of water from 25 to 400 °C: Revised analysis of new and old diffraction data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.473030
- The paper
- Soper, A. K., Bruni, F., & Ricci, M. A. (1997). Site–site pair correlation functions of water from 25 to 400 °C: Revised analysis of new and old diffraction data. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.