The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems
Abstract
This paper introduces an approach to assess and improve the time-dependent resilience of urban infrastructure systems, where resilience is defined as the systems’ ability to resist various possible hazards, absorb the initial damage from hazards, and recover to normal operation one or multiple times during a time period T. For different values of T and its position relative to current time, there are three forms of resilience: previous resilience, current potential resilience, and future potential resilience. This paper mainly discusses the third form that takes into account the systems’ future evolving processes. Taking the power transmission grid in Harris County, Texas, USA as an example, the time-dependent features of resilience and the effectiveness of some resilience-inspired strategies, including enhancement of situational awareness, management of consumer demand, and integration of distributed generators, are all simulated and discussed. Results show a nonlinear nature of resilience as a function of T, which may exhibit a transition from an increasing function to a decreasing function at either a threshold of post-blackout improvement rate, a threshold of load profile with consumer demand management, or a threshold number of integrated distributed generators. These results are further confirmed by studying a typical benchmark system such as the IEEE RTS-96. Such common trends indicate that some resilience strategies may enhance infrastructure system resilience in the short term, but if not managed well, they may compromise practical utility system resilience in the long run.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Holling, C. S. (1973) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · Cited by 18,995
A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003) · Earthquake Spectra · doi:10.1193/1.1623497 · Cited by 5,440
Grigg, C., Wong, P., Albrecht, P., Allan, R., Bhavaraju, M., Billinton, R., Chen, Q., Fong, C., Haddad, S., Kuruganty, S., et al. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/59.780914 · Cited by 3,054
Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M. (2010) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,580
Andersson, G., Donalek, P., Farmer, R., Hatziargyriou, N., Kamwa, I., Kundur, P., Martins, N., Paserba, J., Pourbeik, P., Sanchez-Gasca, J., et al. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857942 · Cited by 1,297
Dobson, I., Carreras, B. A., Lynch, V. E., & Newman, D. E. (2007) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.2737822 · Cited by 954
Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time
Henry, D., & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, J. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002 · Cited by 951
A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems
Ouyang, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L., & Min, X. (2012) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004 · Cited by 856
Self-citationMeasuring Improvements in the Disaster Resilience of Communities
Chang, S. E., & Shinozuka, M. (2004) · Earthquake Spectra · doi:10.1193/1.1775796 · Cited by 678
On the Definition of Resilience in Systems
Haimes, Y. Y. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01216.x · Cited by 626
Cited by
Metrics and quantification of operational and infrastructure resilience in power systems
Panteli, M., Mancarella, P., Trakas, D. N., Kyriakides, E., & Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2664141 · Cited by 809
Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures
Zio, E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Ouyang, M., & Dueñas-Osorio, L.
- Venue
- Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-08-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 033122-033122
- ISSN
- 1054-1500 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2021598020
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 21.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4737204
- The paper
- Ouyang, M., & Dueñas-Osorio, L. (2012). Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4737204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.