The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization
Open accessAbstract
We give an overview of a complex systems approach to large blackouts of electric power transmission systems caused by cascading failure. Instead of looking at the details of particular blackouts, we study the statistics and dynamics of series of blackouts with approximate global models. Blackout data from several countries suggest that the frequency of large blackouts is governed by a power law. The power law makes the risk of large blackouts consequential and is consistent with the power system being a complex system designed and operated near a critical point. Power system overall loading or stress relative to operating limits is a key factor affecting the risk of cascading failure. Power system blackout models and abstract models of cascading failure show critical points with power law behavior as load is increased. To explain why the power system is operated near these critical points and inspired by concepts from self-organized criticality, we suggest that power system operating margins evolve slowly to near a critical point and confirm this idea using a power system model. The slow evolution of the power system is driven by a steady increase in electric loading, economic pressures to maximize the use of the grid, and the engineering responses to blackouts that upgrade the system. Mitigation of blackout risk should account for dynamical effects in complex self-organized critical systems. For example, some methods of suppressing small blackouts could ultimately increase the risk of large blackouts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cascade-based attacks on complex networks
Motter, A. E., & Lai, Y.-C. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.065102 · Cited by 1,929
Cited by
Universality in network dynamics
Barzel, B., & Barabási, A.-L. (2013) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2741 · Cited by 396
Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2011) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.001 · Cited by 367
Small vulnerable sets determine large network cascades in power grids
Yang, Y., Nishikawa, T., & Motter, A. E. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3184 · Cited by 348
Large blackouts in North America: Historical trends and policy implications
Hines, P., Apt, J., & Talukdar, S. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.049 · Cited by 318
Toward a consensus on the definition and taxonomy of power system resilience
Gholami, A., Shekari, T., Amirioun, M. H., Aminifar, F., Amini, M. H., & Sargolzaei, A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2845378 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobson, I., Carreras, B. A., Lynch, V. E., & Newman, D. E.
- Venue
- Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 026103-026103
- ISSN
- 1054-1500 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2106253517
- Cited by
- 954
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2737822
- The paper
- Dobson, I., Carreras, B. A., Lynch, V. E., & Newman, D. E. (2007). Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2737822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.