The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The determination of an accurate isotope dependent potential energy surface for water from extensive ab initio calculations and experimental data
Abstract
We report on the determination of a high quality ab initio potential energy surface (PES) and dipole moment function for water. This PES is empirically adjusted to improve the agreement between the computed line positions and those from the HITRAN 92 data base with J⩽5 for H216O. The changes in the PES are small, nonetheless including an estimate of core (oxygen 1s) electron correlation greatly improves the agreement with the experiment. Using this adjusted PES, we can match 30 092 of the 30 117 transitions in the HITRAN 96 data base for H216O with theoretical lines. The 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90 percentiles of the difference between the calculated and tabulated line positions are −0.11, −0.04, −0.01, 0.02, and 0.07 cm−1. Nonadiabatic effects are not explicitly included. About 3% of the tabulated line positions appear to be incorrect. Similar agreement using this adjusted PES is obtained for the 17O and 18O isotopes. For HD16O, the agreement is not as good, with a root-mean-square error of 0.25 cm−1 for lines with J⩽5. This error is reduced to 0.02 cm−1 by including a small asymmetric correction to the PES, which is parameterized by simultaneously fitting to HD16O and D216O data. Scaling this correction by mass factors yields good results for T2O and HTO. The intensities summed over vibrational bands are usually in good agreement between the calculations and the tabulated results, but individual line strengths can differ greatly. A high-temperature list consisting of 307 721 352 lines is generated for H216O using our PES and dipole moment function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database
Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hill, C., Kochanov, R. V., Tan, Y., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K. V., et al. (2017) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.038 · Cited by 7,721
“[93] Schwenke DW, Tashkun SA, Lee TJ.”
InfluentialOn representing chemical environments
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.184115 · Cited by 2,572
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner‐Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428642 · Cited by 1,327
Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., & Baron, E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306745 · Cited by 1,207
The Limiting Effects of Dust in Brown Dwarf Model Atmospheres
Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., & Schweitzer, A. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321547 · Cited by 1,062
Metadata
- Authors
- Partridge, H., & Schwenke, D. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-03-15
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4618-4639
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1986350436
- Cited by
- 1,155
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The determination of an accurate isotope dependent potential energy surface for water from extensive ab initio calculations and experimental data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.473987
- The paper
- Partridge, H., & Schwenke, D. W. (1997). The determination of an accurate isotope dependent potential energy surface for water from extensive ab initio calculations and experimental data. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.