The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaussian-3 (G3) theory for molecules containing first and second-row atoms
Abstract
Gaussian-3 theory (G3 theory) for the calculation of molecular energies of compounds containing first (Li–F) and second row (Na–Cl) atoms is presented. This new theoretical procedure, which is based on ab initio molecular-orbital theory, modifies G2 theory [J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7221 (1991)] in several ways including a new sequence of single point energy calculations using different basis sets, a new formulation of the higher level correction, a spin–orbit correction for atoms, and a correction for core correlation. G3 theory is assessed using 299 energies from the G2/97 test set including enthalpies of formation, ionization potentials, electron affinities, and proton affinities. This new procedure corrects many of the deficiencies of G2 theory. There is a large improvement for nonhydrogen systems such as SiF4 and CF4, substituted hydrocarbons, and unsaturated cyclic species. Core-related correlation is found to be a significant factor, especially for species with unsaturated rings. The average absolute deviation from experiment for the 148 calculated enthalpies of formation is reduced to under one kcal/mol, from 1.56 kcal/mol for G2 theory to 0.94 kcal/mol for G3 theory. Significant improvement is also found for ionization potentials and electron affinities. The overall average absolute deviation of G3 theory from experiment for the 299 energies is 1.02 kcal/mol compared to 1.48 kcal/mol for G2 theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Self-citation
Cited by
Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential
Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E., & Ernzerhof, M. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1564060 · Cited by 19,629
Minimally augmented Karlsruhe basis sets
Zheng, J., Xu, X., & Truhlar, D. G. (2011) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z · Cited by 1,067
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules
Bartók, A. P., De, S., Poelking, C., Bernstein, N., Kermode, J. R., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701816 · Cited by 764
Hautier, G., Ong, S. P., Jain, A., Moore, C. J., & Ceder, G. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.155208 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtiss, L. A., Raghavachari, K., Redfern, P. C., Rassolov, V., & Pople, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-11-08
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7764-7776
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2040195084
- Cited by
- 2,865
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaussian-3 (G3) theory for molecules containing first and second-row atoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.477422
- The paper
- Curtiss, L. A., Raghavachari, K., Redfern, P. C., Rassolov, V., & Pople, J. A. (1998). Gaussian-3 (G3) theory for molecules containing first and second-row atoms. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.477422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.