Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Calculation of conformational transitions and barriers in solvated systems: Application to the alanine dipeptide in water

Apostolakis, Joannis, Ferrara, Philippe, Caflisch, Amedeo·1999·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Optimal free energy paths (OFEPs) for conformational transitions are parallel to the mean force at every nonstationary point of the free energy landscape. In contrast to adiabatic paths, which are parallel to the force, OFEPs include the effect of entropy and are relevant even for systems with diffusive degrees of freedom. In this study the OFEPs are computed for the alanine dipeptide in solution. The potential of mean force is calculated and an effective potential is derived that is used to obtain the paths with a minimization based algorithm. The comparison of the calculated paths with the adiabatic paths in vacuo shows the influence of the environment on conformational transitions. The dynamics of the alanine dipeptide in water are more complex, since there are more minima and the barriers are lower. Two simpler methods for the calculation of reaction pathways in solution are evaluated by comparing their results with the OFEPs. In the first method the mean electrostatic field of the water is approximated by an analytical continuum model. The obtained paths show qualitative agreement with the OFEPs and the height of the barriers are similar. Targeted molecular dynamics (TMD), the second approach, constrains the distance to a target conformation to accelerate the transition. In the general case, however, it is difficult to assess the physical significance of the obtained paths. Changing the initial conditions by assigning different velocities leads to different solutions for the conformational transition. Furthermore, it is shown that by performing the simulations with different reaction coordinates or in opposite directions different pathways are preferred. This result can be explained by the structure of the free energy landscape around the initial conformations. In a first approximation the physical significance of different pathways is assumed to depend mainly on the free energy at the highest saddle point. In the literature the total energy of the system has often been used to estimate the position and the height of the energy barriers in the path. By comparing the total energy with the calculated free energy it is shown that the former largely overestimates the height of the barriers. Furthermore, the positions of the maxima of the total energy do not coincide with the free energy barriers. Simple approximations to the free energy lead to good quantitative agreement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.477819

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Apostolakis, J., Ferrara, P., & Caflisch, A.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1999-01-22
Volume
110
Issue
4
Pages
2099-2108
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2017370697
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculation of conformational transitions and barriers in solvated systems: Application to the alanine dipeptide in water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.477819
The paper
Apostolakis, J., Ferrara, P., & Caflisch, A. (1999). Calculation of conformational transitions and barriers in solvated systems: Application to the alanine dipeptide in water. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.477819

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.