The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ab initio classical trajectories on the Born–Oppenheimer surface: Hessian-based integrators using fifth-order polynomial and rational function fits
Abstract
Classical trajectories can be computed directly from electronic structure calculations without constructing a global potential-energy surface. When the potential energy and its derivatives are needed during the integration of the classical equations of motion, they are calculated by electronic structure methods. In the Born–Oppenheimer approach the wave function is converged rather than propagated to generate a more accurate potential-energy surface. If analytic second derivatives (Hessians) can be computed, steps of moderate size can be taken by integrating the equations of motion on a local quadratic approximation to the surface (a second-order algorithm). A more accurate integration method is described that uses a second-order predictor step on a local quadratic surface, followed by a corrector step on a better local surface fitted to the energies, gradients, and Hessians computed at the beginning and end points of the predictor step. The electronic structure work per step is the same as the second-order Hessian based integrator, since the energy, gradient and Hessian at the end of the step are used for the local quadratic surface for the next predictor step. A fifth-order polynomial fit performs somewhat better than a rational function fit. For both methods the step size can be a factor of 10 larger than for the second order approach without loss of accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Current Status of Transition-State Theory
Truhlar, D. G., Garrett, B. C., & Klippenstein, S. J. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp953748q · Cited by 2,279
Cited by
Hratchian, H. P., & Schlegel, H. B. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct0499783 · Cited by 985
Self-citationIyengar, S. S., Schlegel, H. B., Millam, J. M., A. Voth, G., Scuseria, G. E., & Frisch, M. J. (2001) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1416876 · Cited by 451
Self-citationLi, X., Tully, J. C., Schlegel, H. B., & Frisch, M. J. (2005) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2008258 · Cited by 386
Self-citationHratchian, H. P., & Schlegel, H. B. (2005) · Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-044451719-7/50053-6 · Cited by 360
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Millam, J. M., Bakken, V., Chen, W., Hase, W. L., & Schlegel, H. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3800-3805
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2053717258
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ab initio classical trajectories on the Born–Oppenheimer surface: Hessian-based integrators using fifth-order polynomial and rational function fits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.480037
- The paper
- Millam, J. M., Bakken, V., Chen, W., Hase, W. L., & Schlegel, H. B. (1999). Ab initio classical trajectories on the Born–Oppenheimer surface: Hessian-based integrators using fifth-order polynomial and rational function fits. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.