Cited by 132Glass properties and applicationsSemiconductor materials and devicesNuclear materials and radiation effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion of oxygen in amorphous Al2O3, Ta2O5, and Nb2O5

Open access

Abstract

The self-diffusivity of oxygen in amorphous Al2O3 (a-Al2O3), a-Ta2O5, and a-Nb2O5 was investigated along with structural analysis in terms of pair distribution function (PDF). The low activation energy, ∼1.2 eV, for diffusion in the oxides suggests a single atomic jump of oxygen ions mediated via vacancy-like defects. However, the pre-exponential factor for a-Ta2O5 and a-Nb2O5 with lower bond energy was two orders of magnitude larger than that for a-Al2O3 with higher bond energy. PDF analyses revealed that the short-range configuration in a-Ta2O5 and a-Nb2O5 was more broadly distributed than that in a-Al2O3. Due to the larger variety of atomic configurations of a-Ta2O5 and a-Nb2O5, these oxides have a higher activation entropy for diffusion than a-Al2O3. The entropy term for diffusion associated with short-range structures was shown to be a dominant factor for diffusion in amorphous oxides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4889800

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 132

Metadata

Authors
Nakamura, R., Toda, T., Tsukui, S., Tane, M., Ishimaru, M., Suzuki, T., & Nakajima, H.
Affiliations
  • Osaka Prefecture University (JP)
  • The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Kyushu Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Foundation Wakasa Wan Energy Research Center (JP)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
116
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2048014664
Cited by
132
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Osaka Prefecture University Repository (Osaka Prefecture University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor materials and devices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nuclear materials and radiation effects
Keywords
oxygen self-diffusion, amorphous oxides, amorphous Al2O3, amorphous Ta2O5, activation energy, vacancy-like defects, pair distribution function, short-range order, activation entropy, bond energy, pre-exponential factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review