Cited by 44Thermal properties of materialsThermal Radiation and Cooling TechnologiesAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

Thermal conduction in lattice–matched superlattices of InGaAs/InAlAs

Sood, Aditya, Rowlette, Jeremy A., Caneau, Catherine G., Bozorg-Grayeli, Elah, Asheghi, Mehdi, Goodson, Kenneth E.·2014·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

Understanding the relative importance of interface scattering and phonon-phonon interactions on thermal transport in superlattices (SLs) is essential for the simulation of practical devices, such as quantum cascade lasers (QCLs). While several studies have looked at the dependence of the thermal conductivity of SLs on period thickness, few have systematically examined the effect of varying material thickness ratio. Here, we study through-plane thermal conduction in lattice-matched In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As SLs grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition as a function of SL period thickness (4.2 to 8.4 nm) and layer thickness ratio (1:3 to 3:1). Conductivities are measured using time-domain thermoreflectance and vary between 1.21 and 2.31 W m−1 K−1. By studying the trends of the thermal conductivities for large SL periods, we estimate the bulk conductivities of In0.53Ga0.47As and In0.52Al0.48As to be approximately 5 W m−1 K−1 and 1 W m−1 K−1, respectively, the latter being an order of magnitude lower than theoretical estimates. Furthermore, we find that the Kapitza resistance between alloy layers has an upper bound of ≈0.1 m2 K GW−1, and is negligible compared to the intrinsic alloy resistances, even for 2 nm thick layers. A phonon Boltzmann transport model yields good agreement with the data when the alloy interfaces are modeled using a specular boundary condition, pointing towards the high-quality of interfaces. We discuss the potential impact of these results on the design and operation of high-power QCLs comprised of In1−xGaxAs/In1−yAlyAs SL cores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4892575

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sood, A., Rowlette, J. A., Caneau, C. G., Bozorg-Grayeli, E., Asheghi, M., & Goodson, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Daylight Solutions 3 , San Diego, California 92128, USA
  • Corning (United States) (US)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2014-08-04
Volume
105
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2046064854
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0195)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Keywords
thermal conductivity, InGaAs/InAlAs superlattice, interfacial thermal resistance, interface scattering, phonon-phonon interaction, quantum cascade lasers, layer thickness ratio, time-domain thermoreflectance, specular boundary conditions, InGaAs, InAlAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review