Cited by 73Plasma Applications and DiagnosticsMicrobial Inactivation MethodsPulsed Power Technology Applications

Synergistic antibacterial effects of treatments with low temperature plasma jet and pulsed electric fields

Zhang, Qian, Zhuang, Jie, von Woedtke, Thomas, Kolb, Juergen F., Zhang, Jue, Fang, Jing, Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter·2014·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by a non-thermal argon operated plasma jet and by microsecond pulsed electric fields (PEF) was investigated. The different methods were either applied by themselves or in combination with each other. Treatments with plasma alone or pulsed electric fields alone were found to result in significant but not complete inactivation. A 2-log reduction was observed for the longest plasma exposure time of 3 min or for the application of 300 consecutive electric field pulses with 100-μs duration and 15-kV/cm amplitude. For the combined treatment with non-thermal plasma and pulsed electric fields, significant synergistic antibacterial effects were observed when samples were treated with plasma first. However, only an additive or at most a slight synergistic effect was observed when samples were first treated with pulsed electric fields instead. The acidification of the bacteria suspension after plasma treatment is likely responsible for the support of subsequent reaction mechanisms that are induced by exposures to pulsed electric fields and is hence the reason for the observed synergy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4895731

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CP generates reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) that inactivate microbes by oxidizing lipid membranes, inducing DNA strand breaks, and denaturing functional proteins.

    “These highly reactive transient species mediate diverse chemical interactions, notably in microbial inactivation where they selectively target bacterial cellular components: oxidizing lipid membranes via peroxidation, inducing DNA strand breaks through radical attack, and denaturing functional proteins by amino acid modification.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Zhang, Q., Zhuang, J., von Woedtke, T., Kolb, J. F., Zhang, J., Fang, J., & Weltmann, K.-D.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP Greifswald) 2 , Greifswald 17489, Germany
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2014-09-08
Volume
105
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2032472576
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Pulsed Power Technology Applications
Keywords
non-thermal plasma, argon plasma jet, pulsed electric field, Staphylococcus aureus, bacterial inactivation, synergistic antibacterial activity, combination therapy, food safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review