Cited by 147Gas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

Direct simulation Monte Carlo: The quest for speed

Open access
Gallis, Michael A., Torczynski, John R., Plimpton, Steven J., Rader, Daniel J., Koehler, Timothy·2014·AIP Conference Proceedings

Abstract

In the 50 years since its invention, the acceptance and applicability of the DSMC method have increased significantly.Extensive verification and validation efforts have led to its greater acceptance, whereas the increase in computer speed has been the main factor behind its greater applicability.As the performance of a single processor reaches its limit, massively parallel computing is expected to play an even stronger role in its future development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4902571

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DSMC codes and panel-method codes, such as SPARTA, ADBSat, and the Response Surface Modelling Toolkit, implement GSI models and are often used to estimate the aerodynamic coefficients of a given platform geometry.

    “Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) codes and panel-method codes, such as SPARTA (Gallis et al. [29]), ADBSat (Sinpetru et al. [30]), and the Response Surface Modelling Toolkit (Sheridan et al. [31]), implement GSI models and are often used to estimate the aerodynamic coefficients of a given platform geometry.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. G. A. Bird, Molecular Gas Dynamics, Oxford University Press, 1976.
  2. G. A. Bird, Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows, Oxford Science Publications, 1994.
  3. S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases, third edition, Cambridge University Press, 1970.
  4. L. H. Holway, Jr., Phys. Fluids 9 (9), 1658, 1966.
  5. M. A. Gallis, J. R. Torczynski, Phys. Fluids 23 (3), 030601, 2011.
  6. M. A. Gallis and J. R. Torczynski, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 67 (8), 2010.
  7. K. Kadau, J. L. Barber, T. C. Germann, B. L. Holian, and B. Alder, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1547-1560, 2010.
  8. G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc., Ser. A 201, 192-196, 1950.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallis, M. A., Torczynski, J. R., Plimpton, S. J., Rader, D. J., & Koehler, T.
Affiliations
Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Published
2014
Volume
1628
Pages
27-36
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019969350
Cited by
147
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
FWCI
24.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sandia National Laboratories
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
direct simulation Monte Carlo, computational efficiency, rarefied gas dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review