Invited Article: Generation of one-million-mode continuous-variable cluster state by unlimited time-domain multiplexing
Open accessAbstract
In recent quantum optical continuous-variable experiments, the number of fully inseparable light modes has drastically increased by introducing a multiplexing scheme either in the time domain or in the frequency domain. Here, modifying the time-domain multiplexing experiment reported in the work of Yokoyama et al. [Nat. Photonics 7, 982 (2013)], we demonstrate the successive generation of fully inseparable light modes for more than one million modes. The resulting multi-mode state is useful as a dual-rail continuous variable cluster state. We circumvent the previous problem of optical phase drifts, which has limited the number of fully inseparable light modes to around ten thousands, by continuous feedback control of the optical system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enacting nonlinear functions has been a dominant challenge for qubit-based quantum neural networks.
“Enacting nonlinear functions has otherwise been a dominant challenge for qubitbased quantum neural networks [64].”
From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
Large one- and two-dimensional cluster states have been deterministically generated with programmable linear operations implemented by projective measurements, using time-domain multiplexing.
“Using time-domain multiplexing, large one- and two-dimensional cluster states have been deterministically generated21–23 with programmable linear operations implemented by projective measurements24,25”
From Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 257
- Authors
- Yoshikawa, J.-I., Yokoyama, S., Kaji, T., Sornphiphatphong, C., Shiozawa, Y., Makino, K., & Furusawa, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- APL Photonics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2378-0967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2475304489
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- APL Photonics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
- Japan Science and Technology Agency
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- time-domain multiplexing, multimode entanglement, dual-rail encoding, continuous feedback control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review