Cited by 102Thermal properties of materialsHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

Thermal conductivity model for powdered materials under vacuum based on experimental studies

Open access
Sakatani, N., Ogawa, K., Iijima, Y., Arakawa, M., Honda, R., Tanaka, S.·2017·AIP Advances

Abstract

The thermal conductivity of powdered media is characteristically very low in vacuum, and is effectively dependent on many parameters of their constituent particles and packing structure. Understanding of the heat transfer mechanism within powder layers in vacuum and theoretical modeling of their thermal conductivity are of great importance for several scientific and engineering problems. In this paper, we report the results of systematic thermal conductivity measurements of powdered media of varied particle size, porosity, and temperature under vacuum using glass beads as a model material. Based on the obtained experimental data, we investigated the heat transfer mechanism in powdered media in detail, and constructed a new theoretical thermal conductivity model for the vacuum condition. This model enables an absolute thermal conductivity to be calculated for a powder with the input of a set of powder parameters including particle size, porosity, temperature, and compressional stress or gravity, and vice versa. Our model is expected to be a competent tool for several scientific and engineering fields of study related to powders, such as the thermal infrared observation of air-less planetary bodies, thermal evolution of planetesimals, and performance of thermal insulators and heat storage powders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4975153

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakatani, N., Ogawa, K., Iijima, Y., Arakawa, M., Honda, R., & Tanaka, S.
Affiliations
  • Meiji University (JP)
  • Kobe University (JP)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
  • University of Kochi (JP)
Venue
AIP Advances
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2158-3226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582440182
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIP Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • JAXA Repository (JAXA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26-6845)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Keywords
thermal conductivity, vacuum, glass beads, particle size, porosity, heat transfer mechanisms, thermal conductivity models, compressive stress, gravity effects, thermal insulation, planetary bodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review