The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards sustainable agriculture: Fossil-free ammonia
Open accessAbstract
About 40% of our food would not exist without synthetic ammonia (NH3) for fertilization. Yet, NH3 production is energy intensive. About 2% of the world's commercial energy is consumed as fossil fuels for NH3 synthesis based on the century-old Haber-Bosch (H.-B.) process. The state of the art and the opportunities for reducing the fossil energy footprint of industrial H.-B. NH3 synthesis are discussed. It is shown that even a hypothetical utterly revolutionary H.-B. catalyst could not significantly reduce the energy demand of H.-B. NH3 as this is governed by hydrogen production. Renewable energy-enabled, fossil-free NH3 synthesis is then evaluated based on the exceptional and continuing cost decline of renewable electricity. H.-B. syngas (H2, N2) is assumed to be produced by electrolysis and cryogenic air separation and then supplied to an existing H.-B. synthesis loop. Fossil-free NH3 could be produced for energy costs of about $232 per tonne NH3 without claiming any economic benefits for the avoidance of about 1.5 tonnes of CO2 released per tonne NH3 compared to the most efficient H.-B. implementations. Research into alternatives to the H.-B. process might be best targeted at emerging markets with currently little NH3 synthesis capacity but significant future population growth in markets such as Africa. Reduced capital intensity, good scale-down economics, tolerance for process upsets and contamination, and intermittent operability are some desirable characteristics of NH3 synthesis in less developed markets and for stranded resources. Processes that are fundamentally different from H.-B. may come to the fore under these specific boundary conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies
Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., Burlingame, B., Dawkins, M., Dolan, L., Fraser, D., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234485 · Cited by 1,741
Cited by
Net-zero emissions energy systems
Davis, S. J., Lewis, N. S., Shaner, M., Aggarwal, S., Arent, D., Azevedo, I. L., Benson, S. M., Bradley, T., Brouwer, J., Chiang, Y.-M., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9793 · Cited by 2,391
Large-scale storage of hydrogen
Andersson, J., & Grönkvist, S. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.063 · Cited by 1,356
Yang, W., Prabhakar, R. R., Tan, J., Tilley, S. D., & Moon, J. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00997j · Cited by 787
Sustainable Ammonia Production Processes
Ghavam, S., Vahdati, M., Wilson, I. A. G., & Styring, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.580808 · Cited by 561
Can sustainable ammonia synthesis pathways compete with fossil-fuel based Haber–Bosch processes?
Wang, M., Khan, M. A., Mohsin, I., Wicks, J., Ip, A. H., Sumon, K. Z., Dinh, C.-T., Sargent, E. H., Gates, I. D., & Kibria, M. G. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee03808c · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfromm, P. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-05-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1941-7012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2621030767
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards sustainable agriculture: Fossil-free ammonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4985090
- The paper
- Pfromm, P. H. (2017). Towards sustainable agriculture: Fossil-free ammonia. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.