The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices
Abstract
Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) is emerging as a viable candidate for certain classes of power electronics, solar blind UV photodetectors, solar cells, and sensors with capabilities beyond existing technologies due to its large bandgap. It is usually reported that there are five different polymorphs of Ga2O3, namely, the monoclinic (β-Ga2O3), rhombohedral (α), defective spinel (γ), cubic (δ), or orthorhombic (ε) structures. Of these, the β-polymorph is the stable form under normal conditions and has been the most widely studied and utilized. Since melt growth techniques can be used to grow bulk crystals of β-GaO3, the cost of producing larger area, uniform substrates is potentially lower compared to the vapor growth techniques used to manufacture bulk crystals of GaN and SiC. The performance of technologically important high voltage rectifiers and enhancement-mode Metal-Oxide Field Effect Transistors benefit from the larger critical electric field of β-Ga2O3 relative to either SiC or GaN. However, the absence of clear demonstrations of p-type doping in Ga2O3, which may be a fundamental issue resulting from the band structure, makes it very difficult to simultaneously achieve low turn-on voltages and ultra-high breakdown. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in the growth, processing, and device performance of the most widely studied polymorph, β-Ga2O3. The role of defects and impurities on the transport and optical properties of bulk, epitaxial, and nanostructures material, the difficulty in p-type doping, and the development of processing techniques like etching, contact formation, dielectrics for gate formation, and passivation are discussed. Areas where continued development is needed to fully exploit the properties of Ga2O3 are identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., & Barton, J. K. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt873 · Cited by 2,214
Review of Silicon Carbide Power Devices and Their Applications
She, X., Huang, A. Q., Lucia, O., & Ozpineci, B. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2652401 · Cited by 1,773
Cited by
Perspective: Ga2O3 for ultra-high power rectifiers and MOSFETS
Pearton, S. J., Ren, F., Tadjer, M., & Kim, J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5062841 · Cited by 659
Self-citationFunctional gas sensing nanomaterials: A panoramic view
Malik, R., Tomer, V. K., Mishra, Y. K., & Lin, L. (2020) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5123479 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearton, S. J., Yang, J., Cary, P. H., Ren, F., Kim, J., Tadjer, M. J., & Mastro, M. A.
- Venue
- Applied Physics Reviews
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-01-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1931-9401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2783668429
- Cited by
- 3,117
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 74.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.5006941
- The paper
- Pearton, S. J., Yang, J., Cary, P. H., Ren, F., Kim, J., Tadjer, M. J., & Mastro, M. A. (2018). A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices. Applied Physics Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.