Cited by 49Advanced Data Storage TechnologiesPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesMagnetic properties of thin films

Moore’s law realities for recording systems and memory storage components: HDD, tape, NAND, and optical

Open access
Fontana, Robert E., Decad, Gary M.·2018·AIP Advances

Abstract

This paper describes trends in the storage technologies associated with Linear Tape Open (LTO) Tape cartridges, hard disk drives (HDD), and NAND Flash based storage devices including solid-state drives (SSD). This technology discussion centers on the relationship between cost/bit and bit density and, specifically on how the Moore’s Law perception that areal density doubling and cost/bit halving every two years is no longer being achieved for storage based components. This observation and a Moore’s Law Discussion are demonstrated with data from 9-year storage technology trends, assembled from publically available industry reporting sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5007621

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tape storage costs 7-8 orders of magnitude less than DNA data storage, about 16 USD/TB, with prices decreasing by 10% every year.

    “In comparison, tape storage costs 7–8 orders of magnitude less, i.e., about 16 USD/TB of data, with prices decreasing by 10% every year”
  • While the file system supports theoretical storage densities orders of magnitude higher than archival file storage systems based on hard disk, magnetic tape, or similar archival media, silica encapsulation of DNA file sequences lowers overall data storage density compared with bare DNA memory.

    “First, while our file system supports theoretical storage densities that are orders of magnitude higher than archival file storage systems based on hard disk, magnetic tape, or similar archival media1,40 commonly used today, silica encapsulation of DNA file sequences lowers overall data storage density compared with bare DNA memory (Supplementary Section 6).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fontana, R. E., & Decad, G. M.
Affiliations
IBM Research - Almaden (US)
Venue
AIP Advances
Published
2017-12-19
Volume
8
Issue
5
ISSN
2158-3226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2778907861
Cited by
49
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIP Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Magnetic properties of thin films
Keywords
Moore's law, storage technology trends, hard disk drives, tape storage, NAND flash memory, solid-state drives, optical data storage, bit density, cost per bit, areal density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review