Cited by 422Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisMental Health Research Topics

Causal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation

Open access
Runge, J.·2018·Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science

Abstract

Causal network reconstruction from time series is an emerging topic in many fields of science. Beyond inferring directionality between two time series, the goal of causal network reconstruction or causal discovery is to distinguish direct from indirect dependencies and common drivers among multiple time series. Here, the problem of inferring causal networks including time lags from multivariate time series is recapitulated from the underlying causal assumptions to practical estimation problems. Each aspect is illustrated with simple examples including unobserved variables, sampling issues, determinism, stationarity, nonlinearity, measurement error, and significance testing. The effects of dynamical noise, autocorrelation, and high dimensionality are highlighted in comparison studies of common causal reconstruction methods. Finally, method performance evaluation approaches and criteria are suggested. The article is intended to briefly review and accessibly illustrate the foundations and practical problems of time series-based causal discovery and stimulate further methodological developments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5025050

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runge, J.
Affiliations
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Corresponding author
Runge, J.
Venue
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
075310-075310
ISSN
  • 1054-1500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7682
OpenAlex
W2884025810
Cited by
422
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 7
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
causal discovery, multivariate time series, time delay, latent variables, sampling issues, determinism, stationarity, nonlinearity, measurement error, significance testing, dynamic noise, autocorrelation, high dimensionality, method performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review