Causal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation
Open accessAbstract
Causal network reconstruction from time series is an emerging topic in many fields of science. Beyond inferring directionality between two time series, the goal of causal network reconstruction or causal discovery is to distinguish direct from indirect dependencies and common drivers among multiple time series. Here, the problem of inferring causal networks including time lags from multivariate time series is recapitulated from the underlying causal assumptions to practical estimation problems. Each aspect is illustrated with simple examples including unobserved variables, sampling issues, determinism, stationarity, nonlinearity, measurement error, and significance testing. The effects of dynamical noise, autocorrelation, and high dimensionality are highlighted in comparison studies of common causal reconstruction methods. Finally, method performance evaluation approaches and criteria are suggested. The article is intended to briefly review and accessibly illustrate the foundations and practical problems of time series-based causal discovery and stimulate further methodological developments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heatwave prediction using time series weather data faces challenges primarily due to high class imbalance.
“Predicting heatwaves using time series weather data presents several challenges, primarily due to high class imbalance17,18.”
From Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for heatwave event prediction in India (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances
Székely, G. J., Rizzo, M. L., & Bakirov, N. K. (2007) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053607000000505 · Cited by 2,684 · see citing works
Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances
Spirtes, P., & Zhang, K. (2016) · Applied Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predictors and prediction skill for marine cold‐air outbreaks over the Barents Sea
Polkova*, I., Afargan‐Gerstman, H., Domeisen, D. I. V., King, M. P., Ruggieri, P., Athanasiadis, P., Dobrynin, M., Aarnes, Ø., Kretschmer, M., & Baehr, J. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.4038 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for heatwave event prediction in India
V, R. C., Johnvictor, A. C., & N, P. S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-04634-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Runge, J.
- Affiliations
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Runge, J.
- ORCID
- Runge, J.
- Venue
- Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-07-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 075310-075310
- ISSN
- 1054-1500 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2884025810
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- causal discovery, multivariate time series, time delay, latent variables, sampling issues, determinism, stationarity, nonlinearity, measurement error, significance testing, dynamic noise, autocorrelation, high dimensionality, method performance evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review