Cited by 304Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy and History of ScienceStatistical Methods and Inference

Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances

Open access
Spirtes, Peter, Zhang, Kun·2016·Applied Informatics

Abstract

This paper aims to give a broad coverage of central concepts and principles involved in automated causal inference and emerging approaches to causal discovery from i.i.d data and from time series. After reviewing concepts including manipulations, causal models, sample predictive modeling, causal predictive modeling, and structural equation models, we present the constraint-based approach to causal discovery, which relies on the conditional independence relationships in the data, and discuss the assumptions underlying its validity. We then focus on causal discovery based on structural equations models, in which a key issue is the identifiability of the causal structure implied by appropriately defined structural equation models: in the two-variable case, under what conditions (and why) is the causal direction between the two variables identifiable? We show that the independence between the error term and causes, together with appropriate structural constraints on the structural equation, makes it possible. Next, we report some recent advances in causal discovery from time series. Assuming that the causal relations are linear with nonGaussian noise, we mention two problems which are traditionally difficult to solve, namely causal discovery from subsampled data and that in the presence of confounding time series. Finally, we list a number of open questions in the field of causal discovery and inference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]Lacerda G Spirtes P Ramsey J Hoyer PO Discovering cyclic causal models by independent components analysis. Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2008) Helsinki, Finland 2008
  2. [38]Zhang K Hyvärinen A Distinguishing causes from effects using nonlinear acyclic causal models. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings 2010 6 157 164 Presented at NIPS 2008 workshop on causality
  3. [58]Cooper GF Causal discovery from data in the presence of selection bias. Fifth International Workshop on AI and Statistics 1995 140 150

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spirtes, P., & Zhang, K.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Kun
Venue
Applied Informatics
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
2196-0089 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2297288734
Cited by
304
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1317428)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG008540)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
causal discovery, causal inference, constraint-based causal discovery, conditional independence, causal models, structural equation modeling, confounding, non-Gaussian noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review