The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontiers of magnetic force microscopy
Abstract
Since it was first demonstrated in 1987, magnetic force microscopy (MFM) has become a truly widespread and commonly used characterization technique that has been applied to a variety of research and industrial applications. Some of the main advantages of the method includes its high spatial resolution (typically ∼50 nm), ability to work in variable temperature and applied magnetic fields, versatility, and simplicity in operation, all without almost any need for sample preparation. However, for most commercial systems, the technique has historically provided only qualitative information, and the number of available modes was typically limited, thus not reflecting the experimental demands. Additionally, the range of samples under study was largely restricted to “classic” ferromagnetic samples (typically, thin films or patterned nanostructures). Throughout this Perspective article, the recent progress and development of MFM is described, followed by a summary of the current state-of-the-art techniques and objects for study. Finally, the future of this fascinating field is discussed in the context of emerging instrumental and material developments. Aspects including quantitative MFM, the accurate interpretation of the MFM images, new instrumentation, probe-engineering alternatives, and applications of MFM to new (often interdisciplinary) areas of the materials science, physics, and biology will be discussed. We first describe the physical principles of MFM, specifically paying attention to common artifacts frequently occurring in MFM measurements; then, we present a comprehensive review of the recent developments in the MFM modes, instrumentation, and the main application areas; finally, the importance of the technique is speculated upon for emerging or anticipated to emerge fields including skyrmions, 2D-materials, and topological insulators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Makarova, T. L., Sundqvist, B., Höhne, R., Esquinazi, P., Kopelevich, Y., Scharff, P., Davydov, V. A., Kashevarova, L. S., & Rakhmanina, A. V. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35099527 · Cited by 544
RetractedCorrection: Retraction: Magnetic carbon
Makarova, T. L., Sundqvist, B., Höhne, R., Esquinazi, P., Kopelevich, Y., Scharff, P., Davydov, V., Kashevarova, L. S., & Rakhmanina, A. V. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04622 · Cited by 62
RetractedRor2 signaling regulates Golgi structure and transport through IFT20 for tumor invasiveness
Nishita, M., Park, S.-Y., Nishio, T., Kamizaki, K., Wang, Z., Tamada, K., Takumi, T., Hashimoto, R., Otani, H., Pazour, G. J., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x · Cited by 15,947
Hirsch, J. E. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1834 · Cited by 3,163
Observation of the spin Seebeck effect
Uchida, K., Takahashi, S., Harii, K., Ieda, J., Koshibae, W., Ando, K., Maekawa, S., & Saitoh, E. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07321 · Cited by 2,243
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazakova, O., Puttock, R., Barton, C., Corte-León, H., Jaafar, M., Neu, V., & Asenjo, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-02-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2913005290
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontiers of magnetic force microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.5050712
- The paper
- Kazakova, O., Puttock, R., Barton, C., Corte-León, H., Jaafar, M., Neu, V., & Asenjo, A. (2019). Frontiers of magnetic force microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5050712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.