The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A PUF taxonomy
Open accessAbstract
Authentication is an essential cryptographic primitive that confirms the identity of parties during communications. For security, it is important that these identities are complex, in order to make them difficult to clone or guess. In recent years, physically unclonable functions (PUFs) have emerged, in which identities are embodied in structures, rather than stored in memory elements. PUFs provide “digital fingerprints,” where information is usually read from the static entropy of a system, rather than having an identity artificially programmed in, preventing a malicious party from making a copy for nefarious use later on. Many concepts for the physical source of the uniqueness of these PUFs have been developed for multiple different applications. While certain types of PUF have received a great deal of attention, other promising suggestions may be overlooked. To remedy this, we present a review that seeks to exhaustively catalogue and provide a complete organisational scheme towards the suggested concepts for PUFs. Furthermore, by carefully considering the physical mechanisms underpinning the operation of different PUFs, we are able to form relationships between PUF technologies that previously had not been linked and look toward novel forms of PUF using physical principles that have yet to be exploited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strukov, D. B., Snider, G. S., Stewart, D. R., & Williams, R. S. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06932 · Cited by 11,828
Physical unclonable functions for device authentication and secret key generation
Suh, G. E., & Devadas, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the 44th annual conference on Design automation - DAC '07 · doi:10.1145/1278480.1278484 · Cited by 2,065
Pappu, R., Recht, B., Taylor, J., & Gershenfeld, N. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1074376 · Cited by 2,018
Random Laser Action in Semiconductor Powder
Cao, H., Zhao, Y. G., Ho, S. T., Seelig, E. W., Wang, Q. H., & Chang, R. P. H. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2278 · Cited by 1,661
FPGA Intrinsic PUFs and Their Use for IP Protection
Guajardo, J., Kumar, S. S., Schrijen, G.-J., & Tuyls, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74735-2_5 · Cited by 1,203
Modeling attacks on physical unclonable functions
Rührmair, U., Sehnke, F., Sölter, J., Dror, G., Devadas, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1866307.1866335 · Cited by 1,021
Observation ofheAharonov-Bohm Oscillations in Normal-Metal Rings
Webb, R. A., Washburn, S., Umbach, C. P., & Laibowitz, R. B. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.2696 · Cited by 1,012
Lee, J. W., Lim, D., Gassend, B., Suh, G. E., van Dijk, M., & Devadas, S. (2004) · 2004 Symposium on VLSI Circuits. Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37525) · doi:10.1109/vlsic.2004.1346548 · Cited by 842
Selecting Cryptographic Key Sizes
Lenstra, A. K., & Verheul, E. R. (2001) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/s00145-001-0009-4 · Cited by 784
A review of emerging non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies and applications
Chen, A. (2016) · Solid-State Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.sse.2016.07.006 · Cited by 668
Cited by
Genetic physical unclonable functions in human cells
Li, Y., Bidmeshki, M. M., Kang, T., Nowak, C. M., Makris, Y., & Bleris, L. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm4106 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- McGrath, T., Bagci, I. E., Wang, Z. M., Roedig, U., & Young, R. J.
- Venue
- Applied Physics Reviews
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-02-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1931-9401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914764075
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 38.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A PUF taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.5079407
- The paper
- McGrath, T., Bagci, I. E., Wang, Z. M., Roedig, U., & Young, R. J. (2019). A PUF taxonomy. Applied Physics Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5079407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.