The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach
Abstract
In this paper, a data driven approach is presented for the prediction of incompressible laminar steady flow field over airfoils based on the combination of deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and deep Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The flow field over an airfoil depends on the airfoil geometry, Reynolds number, and angle of attack. In conventional approaches, Navier-Stokes (NS) equations are solved on a computational mesh with corresponding boundary conditions to obtain the flow solutions, which is a time consuming task. In the present approach, the flow field over an airfoil is approximated as a function of airfoil geometry, Reynolds number, and angle of attack using deep neural networks without solving the NS equations. The present approach consists of two steps. First, CNN is employed to extract the geometrical parameters from airfoil shapes. Then, the extracted geometrical parameters along with Reynolds number and angle of attack are fed as input to the MLP network to obtain an approximate model to predict the flow field. The required database for the network training is generated using the OpenFOAM solver by solving NS equations. Once the training is done, the flow field around an airfoil can be obtained in seconds. From the prediction results, it is evident that the approach is efficient and accurate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques
Weller, H. G., Tabor, G., Jasak, H., & Fureby, C. (1998) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.168744 · Cited by 5,372
Aerodynamic design via control theory
Jameson, A. (1988) · Journal of Scientific Computing · doi:10.1007/bf01061285 · Cited by 1,930
Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data
Duraisamy, K., Iaccarino, G., & Xiao, H. (2019) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 · Cited by 1,508
OpenFOAM: A C++ Library for Complex Physics Simulations
Jasak, H., Jemcov, A., & Tuković, Ž. (2007) · Cited by 884
Convolutional Neural Networks for Steady Flow Approximation
Guo, X., Li, W., & Iorio, F. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939738 · Cited by 702
Wu, J.-L., Xiao, H., & Paterson, E. (2018) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.3.074602 · Cited by 510
Ling, J., & Templeton, J. (2015) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.4927765 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Deep learning methods for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows
Liu, B., Tang, J., Huang, H., & Lu, X.-Y. (2020) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.5140772 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Sekar, V., Jiang, Q., Shu, C., & Khoo, B. C.
- Venue
- Physics of Fluids
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-05-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1070-6631 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2946771678
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.5094943
- The paper
- Sekar, V., Jiang, Q., Shu, C., & Khoo, B. C. (2019). Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach. Physics of Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.