The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data
Open accessAbstract
Data from experiments and direct simulations of turbulence have historically been used to calibrate simple engineering models such as those based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations. In the past few years, with the availability of large and diverse data sets, researchers have begun to explore methods to systematically inform turbulence models with data, with the goal of quantifying and reducing model uncertainties. This review surveys recent developments in bounding uncertainties in RANS models via physical constraints, in adopting statistical inference to characterize model coefficients and estimate discrepancy, and in using machine learning to improve turbulence models. Key principles, achievements, and challenges are discussed. A central perspective advocated in this review is that by exploiting foundational knowledge in turbulence modeling and physical constraints, researchers can use data-driven approaches to yield useful predictive models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number
Kim, J., Moin, P., & Moser, R. (1987) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112087000892 · Cited by 4,873
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Wang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H. (2017) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 · Cited by 737
Self-citationWang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.07987 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Cited by
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
Brunton, S. L., Noack, B. R., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 · Cited by 3,063
Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations
Champion, K., Lusch, B., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906995116 · Cited by 909
Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning
Fukami, K., Fukagata, K., & Taira, K. (2019) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2019.238 · Cited by 837
Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
Eivazi, H., Tahani, M., Schlatter, P., & Vinuesa, R. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0095270 · Cited by 490
Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach
Sekar, V., Jiang, Q., Shu, C., & Khoo, B. C. (2019) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.5094943 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Duraisamy, K., Iaccarino, G., & Xiao, H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-01-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 357-377
- ISSN
- 0066-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4479
- OpenAlex
- W2795982117
- Cited by
- 1,508
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547
- The paper
- Duraisamy, K., Iaccarino, G., & Xiao, H. (2019). Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.