Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrical Resistivity of Ten Selected Binary Alloy Systems

Ho, C. Y., Ackerman, M. W., Wu, K. Y., Havill, T. N., Bogaard, R. H., Matula, R. A., Oh, S. G., James, H. M.·1983·Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data

Abstract

This work compiles, reviews, and discusses the available data and information on the electrical resistivity of ten selected binary alloy systems and presents the recommended values resulting from critical evaluation, correlation, analysis, and synthesis of the available data and information. The ten binary alloy systems selected are the systems of aluminum–copper, aluminum–magnesium, copper–gold, copper–nickel, copper–palladium, copper–zinc, gold–palladium, gold–silver, iron–nickel, and silver–palladium. The recommended values for each of the ten binary alloy systems except three (aluminum–copper, aluminum–magnesium, and copper–zinc) are given for 27 compositions: 0 (pure element), 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10(5)95, 97, 99, 99.5, and 100% (pure element). For aluminum–copper, aluminum–magnesium, and copper–zinc alloy systems, the recommended values are given for 26, 12, and 11 compositions, respectively. For most of the alloy systems the recommended values cover the temperature range from 1 K to the solidus temperature of the alloys or to about 1200 K. For most of the nine elements constituting the alloy systems, the recommended values cover the temperature range from 1 K to above the melting point into the molten state. The estimated uncertainties in most of the recommended values are about ±3% to ±5%. Key words: alloy systems; alloys; conductivity; critically evaluated data; data analysis; data compilation; data synthesis; electrical conductivity; electrical resistivity; metals; recommended values; resistivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.555684

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Ho, C. Y., Ackerman, M. W., Wu, K. Y., Havill, T. N., Bogaard, R. H., Matula, R. A., Oh, S. G., & James, H. M.
Venue
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data
Published
1983-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
183-322
ISSN
  • 0047-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7845
OpenAlex
W1974024597
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Resistivity of Ten Selected Binary Alloy Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.555684
The paper
Ho, C. Y., Ackerman, M. W., Wu, K. Y., Havill, T. N., Bogaard, R. H., Matula, R. A., Oh, S. G., & James, H. M. (1983). Electrical Resistivity of Ten Selected Binary Alloy Systems. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555684

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.