The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrical Resistivity of Ten Selected Binary Alloy Systems
Abstract
This work compiles, reviews, and discusses the available data and information on the electrical resistivity of ten selected binary alloy systems and presents the recommended values resulting from critical evaluation, correlation, analysis, and synthesis of the available data and information. The ten binary alloy systems selected are the systems of aluminum–copper, aluminum–magnesium, copper–gold, copper–nickel, copper–palladium, copper–zinc, gold–palladium, gold–silver, iron–nickel, and silver–palladium. The recommended values for each of the ten binary alloy systems except three (aluminum–copper, aluminum–magnesium, and copper–zinc) are given for 27 compositions: 0 (pure element), 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10(5)95, 97, 99, 99.5, and 100% (pure element). For aluminum–copper, aluminum–magnesium, and copper–zinc alloy systems, the recommended values are given for 26, 12, and 11 compositions, respectively. For most of the alloy systems the recommended values cover the temperature range from 1 K to the solidus temperature of the alloys or to about 1200 K. For most of the nine elements constituting the alloy systems, the recommended values cover the temperature range from 1 K to above the melting point into the molten state. The estimated uncertainties in most of the recommended values are about ±3% to ±5%. Key words: alloy systems; alloys; conductivity; critically evaluated data; data analysis; data compilation; data synthesis; electrical conductivity; electrical resistivity; metals; recommended values; resistivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jin, K., Sales, B. C., Stocks, G. M., Samolyuk, G. D., Daene, M., Weber, W. J., Zhang, Y., & Bei, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20159 · Cited by 258
Thermal conductivity of metals and alloys
Klemens, P. G., & Williams, R. K. (1986) · International Metals Reviews · doi:10.1179/imtr.1986.31.1.197 · Cited by 182
Jiang, P., Huang, B., & Koh, Y. K. (2016) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.4954969 · Cited by 66
Criss, E. M., & Hofmeister, A. M. (2017) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979217502058 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho, C. Y., Ackerman, M. W., Wu, K. Y., Havill, T. N., Bogaard, R. H., Matula, R. A., Oh, S. G., & James, H. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1983-04-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-322
- ISSN
- 0047-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7845
- OpenAlex
- W1974024597
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Resistivity of Ten Selected Binary Alloy Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.555684
- The paper
- Ho, C. Y., Ackerman, M. W., Wu, K. Y., Havill, T. N., Bogaard, R. H., Matula, R. A., Oh, S. G., & James, H. M. (1983). Electrical Resistivity of Ten Selected Binary Alloy Systems. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.