Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,702

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules: An Update

Hunter, Edward P. L., Lias, Sharon G.·1998·Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data

Abstract

The available data on gas-phase basicities and proton affinities of approximately 1700 molecular, radical and atomic neutral species are evaluated and compiled. Tables of the data are sorted (1) according to empirical formula and (2) according to evaluated gas basicity. This publication constitutes an update of a similar evaluation published in 1984.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.556018

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,702

Metadata

Authors
Hunter, E. P. L., & Lias, S. G.
Venue
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
413-656
ISSN
  • 0047-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7845
OpenAlex
W2044039308
Cited by
2,702
References
0
FWCI
78.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules: An Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.556018
The paper
Hunter, E. P. L., & Lias, S. G. (1998). Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules: An Update. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.556018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.