The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge and fission of droplets in electrostatic sprays
Abstract
Measurements of the charge and size of heptane droplets generated by electrostatic sprays showed that the droplet charge-to-volume ratio is a monotonically decreasing function of size. In the useful range of electrospray operation, characterized by droplets smaller than the size of the orifice from which the liquid is issued, it was found that the larger were the droplets the closer they were to the Rayleigh limit. In particular, when droplets had charging levels between 70% and 80% of such limit, they were observed to rupture because the repulsive force due to surface charge evidently overcame surface tension. The rupture phenomenon, here termed Coulomb fission, was also captured in microphotographs that typically showed a droplet with one or two, diametrically opposed, conical protrusions terminating in a fine jet ejecting a stream of much smaller, apparently equisized offsprings. The process appeared swift and, yet, well ordered, quite different from the common view of a violent, convulsive explosion. Corroborating evidence on the disruption pattern was also gathered by quantitative measurements of the evolution of the droplet size distribution in evaporating sprays using phase Doppler anemometry (PDA). Implications of these findings are finally discussed in the context of a particular application of electrostatic sprays, electrospray ionization, a technique that is revolutionizing the mass-spectrometric analysis of large biomolecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals
Cech, N. B., & Enke, C. G. (2001) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.10008 · Cited by 1,435
Electrospray: From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now
Kebarle, P., & Verkerk, U. H. (2009) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20247 · Cited by 905
A brief overview of the present status of the mechanisms involved in electrospray mass spectrometry
Kebarle, P. (2000) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/1096-9888(200007)35:7<804::aid-jms22>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 675
The Fluid Dynamics of Taylor Cones
Fernández de la Mora, J. (2007) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110159 · Cited by 594
Wang, X., Ding, B., Sun, G., Wang, M., & Yu, J. (2013) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.05.001 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez, A., & Tang, K.
- Venue
- Physics of Fluids
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 404-414
- ISSN
- 1070-6631 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2047311903
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge and fission of droplets in electrostatic sprays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.868037
- The paper
- Gomez, A., & Tang, K. (1994). Charge and fission of droplets in electrostatic sprays. Physics of Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.