Cited by 5Mathematics Education and PedagogyProblem and Project Based LearningSTEM Education

Meta-analysis study: How effective is a project-based learning model on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities?

Yunita, Yunita, Juandi, Dadang, Hasanah, Aan, Suparman·2022·AIP Conference Proceedings

Abstract

Over the past few years, many experimental investigations on the model of project-based learning (PjBL) have affected the mathematical capacity of pupils to solve issues. However, neither the second nor the literature review analysed the combined results of this research. This meta-analysis is aimed at examining and describing the PjBL model's effectiveness in improved student solving mathematical issues in Indonesia. Twelve studies were analysed 2014 to 2021 using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software. The effectiveness of the PjBL model was found to be 1.284 times greater than that of conventional learning models in terms of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities. Additional analysis in the form of study characteristics obtained to bolster the study's findings indicates significant differences at the level of education and publication sources. The application of the PjBL model efficient for mathematical problem-solving abilities when mathematics teachers apply to learn to secondary school students. In addition, researchers should publish their research in the form of articles in reputable journals to improve the quality of their research, the decline in the number of publications over the past three years has allowed many academics to conduct research, the most effective and recommended research sampling technique is the random sampling technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0102458

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Yunita, Y., Juandi, D., Hasanah, A., & Suparman
Affiliations
Indonesia University of Education (ID)
Corresponding author
Yunita, Yunita
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Published
2022
Volume
2597
Pages
070024
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313271116
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
Keywords
project-based learning, mathematical problem solving ability, mathematics education, high school students, conventional learning comparison, teaching method effectiveness, Indonesian mathematics education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review