Cited by 3Second Language Acquisition and LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingArtificial Intelligence in Education

Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT in developing English vocabulary skills

Kambam, Mary Madhuri, Mutyaboyina, Latha, Mohammad, Azam, Kedala, Karunasree Sree·2025·AIP Conference Proceedings

Abstract

This research explores the transformative potential of integrating ChatGPT in English language education, focusing on its impact on vocabulary development. The study, conducted with twenty-five students from St. Martin’s High School in Hyderabad, India, reveals compelling insights into the effectiveness of ChatGPT as a dynamic tool for enhancing language skills. Through a structured program combining ChatGPT interactions and pair activities, participants experienced substantial improvements in individual and group vocabulary scores. The data analysis, employing statistical tools, demonstrated statistically significant advancements post-implementation. Notably, participants exhibited enhanced word comprehension and usage, highlighting the practical applicability of ChatGPT in language education. While unexpected variations were observed among individuals, this study underscores the need for nuanced approaches considering diverse learning styles and proficiency levels. The research contributes to the broader discourse on AI’s role in education, emphasizing the positive outcomes of integrating ChatGPT to create engaging and personalized learning experiences. The findings encourage educators, institutions, and policymakers to consider the strategic incorporation of ChatGPT in language education, recognizing its potential to revolutionize traditional teaching methodologies. Recommendations include providing training and support for effective implementation, ensuring optimal utilization of this innovative technology to nurture language proficiency and foster interactive, student-centered learning environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0247589

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI was employed to deliver personalized and leveled reading materials, helping to reduce obstacles such as comprehension difficulties, anxiety, or lack of confidence resulting from cognitive differences among students.

    “GenAI was employed to deliver personalized and leveled reading materials, helping to reduce obstacles such as comprehension difficulties, anxiety, or lack of confidence resulting from cognitive differences among students [75-80].”
  • In school settings, students repeatedly interact with AI assistants across English writing, reading comprehension, mathematics problem-solving, physics, quantum, and cognitive science, and computer programming.

    “In school settings, students repeatedly interact with AI assistants (such as ChatGPT, custom bots, and social robots) across English writing [85], reading comprehension [76,79,80,107,109], mathematics problem-solving [99,105], physics, quantum, and cognitive science [78,91,104,127], and computer programming [97,98,140,141].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kambam, M. M., Mutyaboyina, L., Mohammad, A., & Kedala, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (IN)
  • Vaagdevi College of Engineering (IN)
Corresponding author
Kambam, Mary Madhuri
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Published
2025
Volume
3281
Pages
050011
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408029952
Cited by
3
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
16.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, English vocabulary, vocabulary acquisition, large language models, AI-assisted language learning, language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review