How good is generative diffusion model for enhanced sampling of protein conformations across scales and in all-atom resolution?
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are fundamental for probing the structural dynamics of biomolecules, yet their efficiency is limited by the high computational cost of exploring long-timescale events. Generative machine learning (ML) models, particularly the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM), offer an emerging strategy to enhance conformational sampling. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities and limitations of DDPM in generating atomistically accurate conformational ensembles across proteins of varying size and structural order, ranging from the 20-residue folded Trp-cage and 58-residue BPTI to the 83-residue intrinsically disordered region Ash1 and the 140-residue intrinsically disordered protein α-Synuclein. Training DDPM on relatively short MD trajectories using both torsion angle and all-atom coordinate data, we demonstrate that it can reproduce key structural features such as secondary structure, radius of gyration, and contact maps, while effectively sampling sparsely populated regions of the conformational landscape. Notably, DDPM can also generate novel conformations, including transitions not explicitly observed in the training data. However, the model occasionally overlooks low-probability regions and may produce conformers with unclear physical relevance, warranting independent validation. These limitations are particularly evident in flexible systems such as IDPs. Overall, this work benchmarks DDPM as a viable tool for augmenting MD simulations, offering enhanced sampling with significant computational savings, while noting its limitations in capturing low-populated conformers. At the same time, it highlights the importance of rigorous validation and thoughtful interpretation when deploying generative models in computational biophysics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2019) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000056 · Cited by 2,609 · see citing works
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model
Ingraham, J. B., Baranov, M., Costello, Z., Barber, K. W., Wang, W., Ismail, A., Frappier, V., Lord, D. M., Ng-Thow-Hing, C., Van Vlack, E. R., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06728-8 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
ProteinSGM: Score-based generative modeling for <i>de novo</i> protein design
Lee, J. S., Kim, J., & Kim, P. M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.13.499967 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence guided conformational mining of intrinsically disordered proteins
Gupta, A., Dey, S., Hicks, A., & Zhou, H.-X. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03562-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Bera, P., & Mondal, J.
- Affiliations
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Bera, Palash
- Mondal, Jagannath
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2025-09-17
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W4414279885
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (RTI 4007)
- Department of Science and Technology of India (CRG/2023/001426)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- denoising diffusion probabilistic models, generative models, protein conformational sampling, intrinsically disordered proteins, alpha-synuclein, aprotinin, Trp-cage, ASH1, secondary structure, radius of gyration, contact maps, dihedral angle
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Diffusion, Protein Conformation, Proteins, alpha-Synuclein, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review