Cited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

How good is generative diffusion model for enhanced sampling of protein conformations across scales and in all-atom resolution?

Open access
Bera, Palash, Mondal, Jagannath·2025·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are fundamental for probing the structural dynamics of biomolecules, yet their efficiency is limited by the high computational cost of exploring long-timescale events. Generative machine learning (ML) models, particularly the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM), offer an emerging strategy to enhance conformational sampling. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities and limitations of DDPM in generating atomistically accurate conformational ensembles across proteins of varying size and structural order, ranging from the 20-residue folded Trp-cage and 58-residue BPTI to the 83-residue intrinsically disordered region Ash1 and the 140-residue intrinsically disordered protein α-Synuclein. Training DDPM on relatively short MD trajectories using both torsion angle and all-atom coordinate data, we demonstrate that it can reproduce key structural features such as secondary structure, radius of gyration, and contact maps, while effectively sampling sparsely populated regions of the conformational landscape. Notably, DDPM can also generate novel conformations, including transitions not explicitly observed in the training data. However, the model occasionally overlooks low-probability regions and may produce conformers with unclear physical relevance, warranting independent validation. These limitations are particularly evident in flexible systems such as IDPs. Overall, this work benchmarks DDPM as a viable tool for augmenting MD simulations, offering enhanced sampling with significant computational savings, while noting its limitations in capturing low-populated conformers. At the same time, it highlights the importance of rigorous validation and thoughtful interpretation when deploying generative models in computational biophysics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0279756

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bera, P., & Mondal, J.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Bera, Palash
  • Mondal, Jagannath
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2025-09-17
Volume
163
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W4414279885
Cited by
7
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (RTI 4007)
  • Department of Science and Technology of India (CRG/2023/001426)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
denoising diffusion probabilistic models, generative models, protein conformational sampling, intrinsically disordered proteins, alpha-synuclein, aprotinin, Trp-cage, ASH1, secondary structure, radius of gyration, contact maps, dihedral angle
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Diffusion, Protein Conformation, Proteins, alpha-Synuclein, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review