Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analgesic effects of morphine and morphine‐6‐glucuronide in a transcutaneous electrical pain model in healthy volunteers

Skarke, Carsten, Darimont, Jutta, Schmidt, Helmut, Geisslinger, Gerd, Lötsch, Jörn·2003·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to quantify the extent and time course of the effects of morphine‐6‐glucuronide and morphine on pain threshold, pain tolerance, pupil diameter, and side effects. Methods: In a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized, 3‐way crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers (6 men and 6 women) received 63 to 112 mg of morphine‐6‐glucuronide or 26 to 66 mg of morphine as an intravenous bolus, followed by an infusion of the same medication for 1.8 to 6.4 hours. Analgesia was assessed every 30 minutes for up to 16 hours by means of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (sine wave, 5 Hz; intensity, 0–9.99 mA). Pupil diameter and side effects were recorded concomitantly. Results: At the administered doses, morphine‐6‐glucuronide and morphine had comparable effects on pain tolerance, pupil diameter, and side effects. The delay between the time course of the plasma concentrations and the time course of the effects was longer for morphine‐6‐glucuronide than for morphine (transfer half‐life, 8.2 hours versus 2.6 hours for pain tolerance and 7.7 hours versus 2.8 hours for pupil diameter). The slope of the linear concentration versus effect relationship for pain tolerance was flatter for morphine‐6‐glucuronide than for morphine (0.05% versus 0.6% increase in pain tolerance per nanomole per liter of morphine‐6‐glucuronide and morphine at effect site, respectively). Morphine‐6‐glucuronide was less potent than morphine in producing pupil constriction (mean concentration at half‐maximum effect, 745 nmol/L versus 26.4 nmol/L for morphine‐6‐glucuronide and morphine, respectively). In carriers of the mutated G118 allele of the μ‐opioid receptor, the potency of the pupil‐constricting effects of morphine‐6‐glucuronide and morphine was significantly smaller, and carriers of the G118 allele reported less nausea and vomited less often after administration of morphine‐6‐glucuronide. Conclusions: Morphine‐6‐glucuronide clearly produced analgesic effects in healthy volunteers. However, the high amounts of systemic morphine‐6‐glucuronide needed to produce the same effects as morphine suggest that morphine‐6‐glucuronide barely contributes to the central nervous opioid effects after administration of analgesic doses of morphine. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2003) 73, 107–121; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2003.5

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mcp.2003.5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Skarke, C., Darimont, J., Schmidt, H., Geisslinger, G., & Lötsch, J.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
107-121
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2034887368
Cited by
226
References
0
FWCI
21.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analgesic effects of morphine and morphine‐6‐glucuronide in a transcutaneous electrical pain model in healthy volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1067/mcp.2003.5
The paper
Skarke, C., Darimont, J., Schmidt, H., Geisslinger, G., & Lötsch, J. (2003). Analgesic effects of morphine and morphine‐6‐glucuronide in a transcutaneous electrical pain model in healthy volunteers. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1067/mcp.2003.5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.