The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generic evaluation methods for disaster drills in developing countries
Abstract
Disaster simulations (drills) are widely used throughout the world and are considered a fundamental tool for evaluation and improvement of local disaster response capacity. Despite this, no generally accepted methodology exists for quantitative evaluation of the medical response to a disaster drill. We therefore set out to develop and prospectively test a comprehensive method to assess both medical provider and organizational performance during a disaster simulation. Because disasters disproportionately affect the populations of developing countries, we designed these methods to be sufficiently flexible to be applicable in both the developed and the developing world. Objective outcome measures were identified for each component of disaster medical response and were incorporated into 3 data collection instruments. The derived methods were applied to a multiagency disaster simulation in Guatemala City, Guatemala. On the basis of this pilot study, suggested modifications and recommendations were made. The ability to objectively identify the specific strengths and weaknesses of an emergency medical services systems' medical response to a disaster is an important step toward optimizing system performance. On the basis of our experience, we recommend the incorporation of objective evaluation methods such as these into every disaster simulation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A number of studies have shown that drills can positively impact the performance of hospitals in dealing with MCIs.8”
From Factors That May Influence the Preparation of Standards of Procedures for Dealing with Mass-Casualty Incidents (2007) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Waeckerle, 1994, Disaster medicine: challenges for today, Ann Emerg Med, 23, 715, 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70304-3 · DOI
- Lillibridge, 1993, Disaster assessment: the emergency health evaluation of a population affected by a disaster, Ann Emerg Med, 22, 1715, 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81311-3 · DOI
- Walz, 1992, Disaster training exercises: an education-based hierarchy, Prehosp Disaster Med, 7, 386, 10.1017/S1049023X00039820 · DOI
- Klain, 1989, Disaster reanimatology potentials: a structured interview study in Armenia: I. Methodology and preliminary results, Prehosp Disaster Med, 4, 135, 10.1017/S1049023X00029939 · DOI
- Ricci, 1991, Disaster reanimatology potentials: a structured interview study in Armenia II. Method for the evaluation of the medical response to major disasters, Prehosp Disaster Med, 6, 159, 10.1017/S1049023X00028284 · DOI
- Pretto, 1992, Disaster reanimatology potentials: a structured interview study in Armenia. III. Results, conclusions, recommendations, Prehosp Disaster Med, 7, 327, 10.1017/S1049023X00039741 · DOI
- Ricci, 1991, Assessment of prehospital and hospital response in disaster, Crit Care Clin, 7, 471, 10.1016/S0749-0704(18)30317-8 · DOI
- Noji, 1996, Disaster epidemiology, Emerg Med Clin North Am, 14, 289, 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70252-2 · DOI
- Task Force on Quality Control of Disaster Management, World Association of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, 1996, Disaster medical response research: a template in the Utstein style, Prehosp Disaster Med, 11, 82, 10.1017/S1049023X00042692 · DOI
- Quarantelli, 1997, Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters, Disasters, 21, 39, 10.1111/1467-7717.00043 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adini, B., Goldberg, A., Laor, D., Cohen, R., & Bar-Dayan, Y. (2007) · Prehospital and Disaster Medicine · doi:10.1017/s1049023x00004611 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, G. B., Modi, S., Lunney, K., & Thomas, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Modi, Surbhi
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 689-699
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072225851
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Facility Location and Emergency Management
- Keywords
- disaster drills, disaster simulation, disaster medical response, emergency medical services, disaster response capacity, performance evaluation, developing countries, multi-agency coordination, evaluation methodology
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Developing Countries, Disaster Planning, Humans, Pilot Projects, Program Evaluation, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generic evaluation methods for disaster drills in developing countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1067/mem.2003.147
- The paper
- Green, G. B., Modi, S., Lunney, K., & Thomas, T. L. (2003). Generic evaluation methods for disaster drills in developing countries. Annals of Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2003.147